Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Mesothelioma Lawsuit Abestos

Mesothelioma Lawsuit

From Wiki

mesothelioma lawsuit is a form of cancer that is almost always caused by exposure to asbestos lawsuit. In this disease, malignant cells develop in the mesothelium, a protective lining that covers most of the body's internal organs. Its most common site is the pleura (outer lining of the lungs and internal chest wall), but it may also occur in the peritoneum (the lining of the abdominal cavity), the heart,[1] the pericardium (a sac that surrounds the heart) or tunica vaginalis.

Most people who develop mesothelioma lawsuit have worked on jobs where they inhaled asbestos lawsuit particles, or they have been exposed to asbestos lawsuit dust and fiber in other ways. It has also been suggested that washing the clothes of a family member who worked with asbestos lawsuit can put a person at risk for developing mesothelioma lawsuit.[2] Unlike lung cancer, there is no association between mesothelioma lawsuit and smoking, but smoking greatly increases risk of other asbestos lawsuit-induced cancer.[3] Compensation via asbestos lawsuit funds or lawsuits is an important issue in mesothelioma lawsuit (see asbestos lawsuit and the law).

The symptoms of mesothelioma lawsuit include shortness of breath due to pleural effusion (fluid between the lung and the chest wall) or chest wall pain, and general symptoms such as weight loss. The diagnosis may be suspected with chest X-ray and CT scan, and is confirmed with a biopsy (tissue sample) and microscopic examination. A thoracoscopy (inserting a tube with a camera into the chest) can be used to take biopsies. It allows the introduction of substances such as talc to obliterate the pleural space (called pleurodesis), which prevents more fluid from accumulating and pressing on the lung. Despite treatment with chemotherapy, radiation therapy or sometimes surgery, the disease carries a poor prognosis. Research about screening tests for the early detection of mesothelioma lawsuit is ongoing.

Signs and symptoms
Symptoms of mesothelioma lawsuit may not appear until 20 to 50 years after exposure to asbestos lawsuit. Shortness of breath, cough, and pain in the chest due to an accumulation of fluid in the pleural space are often symptoms of pleural mesothelioma lawsuit.

Symptoms of peritoneal mesothelioma lawsuit include weight loss and cachexia, abdominal swelling and pain due to ascites (a buildup of fluid in the abdominal cavity). Other symptoms of peritoneal mesothelioma lawsuit may include bowel obstruction, blood clotting abnormalities, anemia, and fever. If the cancer has spread beyond the mesothelium to other parts of the body, symptoms may include pain, trouble swallowing, or swelling of the neck or face.

These symptoms may be caused by mesothelioma lawsuit or by other, less serious conditions.

mesothelioma lawsuit that affects the pleura can cause these signs and symptoms:

Chest wall pain
Pleural effusion, or fluid surrounding the lung
Shortness of breath
Fatigue or anemia
Wheezing, hoarseness, or cough
Blood in the sputum (fluid) coughed up (hemoptysis)
In severe cases, the person may have many tumor masses. The individual may develop a pneumothorax, or collapse of the lung. The disease may metastasize, or spread, to other parts of the body.

Tumors that affect the abdominal cavity often do not cause symptoms until they are at a late stage. Symptoms include:

Abdominal pain
Ascites, or an abnormal buildup of fluid in the abdomen
A mass in the abdomen
Problems with bowel function
Weight loss
In severe cases of the disease, the following signs and symptoms may be present:

Blood clots in the veins, which may cause thrombophlebitis
Disseminated intravascular coagulation, a disorder causing severe bleeding in many body organs
Jaundice, or yellowing of the eyes and skin
Low blood sugar level
Pleural effusion
Pulmonary emboli, or blood clots in the arteries of the lungs
Severe ascites
A mesothelioma lawsuit does not usually spread to the bone, brain, or adrenal glands. Pleural tumors are usually found only on one side of the lungs.

CT scan of a patient with mesothelioma lawsuit, coronal section (the section follows the plane that divides the body in a front and a back half). The mesothelioma lawsuit is indicated by yellow arrows, the central pleural effusion (fluid collection) is marked with a yellow star. Red numbers: (1) right lung, (2) spine, (3) left lung, (4) ribs, (5) descending part of the aorta, (6) spleen, (7) left kidney, (8) right kidney, (9) liver.
Diagnosing mesothelioma lawsuit is often difficult, because the symptoms are similar to those of a number of other conditions. Diagnosis begins with a review of the patient's medical history. A history of exposure to asbestos lawsuit may increase clinical suspicion for mesothelioma lawsuit. A physical examination is performed, followed by chest X-ray and often lung function tests. The X-ray may reveal pleural thickening commonly seen after asbestos lawsuit exposure and increases suspicion of mesothelioma lawsuit. A CT (or CAT) scan or an MRI is usually performed. If a large amount of fluid is present, abnormal cells may be detected by cytology if this fluid is aspirated with a syringe. For pleural fluid this is done by a pleural tap or chest drain, in ascites with an paracentesis or ascitic drain and in a pericardial effusion with pericardiocentesis. While absence of malignant cells on cytology does not completely exclude mesothelioma lawsuit, it makes it much more unlikely, especially if an alternative diagnosis can be made (e.g. tuberculosis, heart failure).

If cytology is positive or a plaque is regarded as suspicious, a biopsy is needed to confirm a diagnosis of mesothelioma lawsuit. A doctor removes a sample of tissue for examination under a microscope by a pathologist. A biopsy may be done in different ways, depending on where the abnormal area is located. If the cancer is in the chest, the doctor may perform a thoracoscopy. In this procedure, the doctor makes a small cut through the chest wall and puts a thin, lighted tube called a thoracoscope into the chest between two ribs. Thoracoscopy allows the doctor to look inside the chest and obtain tissue samples.

If the cancer is in the abdomen, the doctor may perform a laparoscopy. To obtain tissue for examination, the doctor makes a small incision in the abdomen and inserts a special instrument into the abdominal cavity. If these procedures do not yield enough tissue, more extensive diagnostic surgery may be necessary.

Typical immunohistochemistry results Positive Negative
EMA (epithelial membrane antigen) in a membranous distribution CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen)
WT1 (Wilms' tumour 1) B72.3
Calretinin MOC-3 1
Mesothelin-1 CD15
Cytokeratin 5/6 Ber-EP4
HBME-1 (human mesothelial cell 1) TTF-1 (thyroid transcription factor-1)

There is no universally agreed protocol for screening people who have been exposed to asbestos lawsuit. Screening tests might diagnose mesothelioma lawsuit earlier than conventional methods thus improving the survival prospects for patients. The serum osteopontin level might be useful in screening asbestos lawsuit-exposed people for mesothelioma lawsuit. The level of soluble mesothelin-related protein is elevated in the serum of about 75% of patients at diagnosis and it has been suggested that it may be useful for screening.[4] Doctors have begun testing the Mesomark assay which measures levels of soluble mesothelin-related proteins (SMRPs) released by diseased mesothelioma lawsuit cells.[5]

Staging of mesothelioma lawsuit is based on the recommendation by the International mesothelioma lawsuit Interest Group.[6] TNM classification of the primary tumor, lymph node involvement, and distant metastasis is performed. mesothelioma lawsuit is staged Ia–IV (one-A to four) based on the TNM status.[6][7]

The mesothelium consists of a single layer of flattened to cuboidal cells forming the epithelial lining of the serous cavities of the body including the peritoneal, pericardial and pleural cavities. Deposition of asbestos lawsuit fibers in the parenchyma of the lung may result in the penetration of the visceral pleura from where the fiber can then be carried to the pleural surface, thus leading to the development of malignant mesothelial plaques. The processes leading to the development of peritoneal mesothelioma lawsuit remain unresolved, although it has been proposed that asbestos lawsuit fibers from the lung are transported to the abdomen and associated organs via the lymphatic system. Additionally, asbestos lawsuit fibers may be deposited in the gut after ingestion of sputum contaminated with asbestos lawsuit fibers.

Pleural contamination with asbestos lawsuit or other mineral fibers has been shown to cause cancer. Long thin asbestos lawsuit fibers (blue asbestos lawsuit, amphibole fibers) are more potent carcinogens than "feathery fibers" (chrysotile or white asbestos lawsuit fibers).[8] However, there is now evidence that smaller particles may be more dangerous than the larger fibers. They remain suspended in the air where they can be inhaled, and may penetrate more easily and deeper into the lungs. "We probably will find out a lot more about the health aspects of asbestos lawsuit from [the World Trade Center attack], unfortunately," said Dr. Alan Fein, chief of pulmonary and critical-care medicine at North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System. Dr. Fein has treated several patients for "World Trade Center syndrome" or respiratory ailments from brief exposures of only a day or two near the collapsed buildings.[9]

mesothelioma lawsuit development in rats has been demonstrated following intra-pleural inoculation of phosphorylated chrysotile fibers. It has been suggested that in humans, transport of fibers to the pleura is critical to the pathogenesis of mesothelioma lawsuit. This is supported by the observed recruitment of significant numbers of macrophages and other cells of the immune system to localized lesions of accumulated asbestos lawsuit fibers in the pleural and peritoneal cavities of rats. These lesions continued to attract and accumulate macrophages as the disease progressed, and cellular changes within the lesion culminated in a morphologically malignant tumor.

Experimental evidence suggests that asbestos lawsuit acts as a complete carcinogen with the development of mesothelioma lawsuit occurring in sequential stages of initiation and promotion. The molecular mechanisms underlying the malignant transformation of normal mesothelial cells by asbestos lawsuit fibers remain unclear despite the demonstration of its oncogenic capabilities. However, complete in vitro transformation of normal human mesothelial cells to malignant phenotype following exposure to asbestos lawsuit fibers has not yet been achieved. In general, asbestos lawsuit fibers are thought to act through direct physical interactions with the cells of the mesothelium in conjunction with indirect effects following interaction with inflammatory cells such as macrophages.

Analysis of the interactions between asbestos lawsuit fibers and DNA has shown that phagocytosed fibers are able to make contact with chromosomes, often adhering to the chromatin fibers or becoming entangled within the chromosome. This contact between the asbestos lawsuit fiber and the chromosomes or structural proteins of the spindle apparatus can induce complex abnormalities. The most common abnormality is monosomy of chromosome 22. Other frequent abnormalities include structural rearrangement of 1p, 3p, 9p and 6q chromosome arms.

Common gene abnormalities in mesothelioma lawsuit cell lines include deletion of the tumor suppressor genes:

Neurofibromatosis type 2 at 22q12
asbestos lawsuit has also been shown to mediate the entry of foreign DNA into target cells. Incorporation of this foreign DNA may lead to mutations and oncogenesis by several possible mechanisms:

Inactivation of tumor suppressor genes
Activation of oncogenes
Activation of proto-oncogenes due to incorporation of foreign DNA containing a promoter region
Activation of DNA repair enzymes, which may be prone to error
Activation of telomerase
Prevention of apoptosis
asbestos lawsuit fibers have been shown to alter the function and secretory properties of macrophages, ultimately creating conditions which favour the development of mesothelioma lawsuit. Following asbestos lawsuit phagocytosis, macrophages generate increased amounts of hydroxyl radicals, which are normal by-products of cellular anaerobic metabolism. However, these free radicals are also known clastogenic and membrane-active agents thought to promote asbestos lawsuit carcinogenicity. These oxidants can participate in the oncogenic process by directly and indirectly interacting with DNA, modifying membrane-associated cellular events, including oncogene activation and perturbation of cellular antioxidant defences.

asbestos lawsuit also may possess immunosuppressive properties. For example, chrysotile fibres have been shown to depress the in vitro proliferation of phytohemagglutinin-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes, suppress natural killer cell lysis and significantly reduce lymphokine-activated killer cell viability and recovery. Furthermore, genetic alterations in asbestos lawsuit-activated macrophages may result in the release of potent mesothelial cell mitogens such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) which in turn, may induce the chronic stimulation and proliferation of mesothelial cells after injury by asbestos lawsuit fibres.

Although reported incidence rates have increased in the past 20 years, mesothelioma lawsuit is still a relatively rare cancer. The incidence rate is approximately one per 1,000,000. The highest incidence is found in Britain, Australia and Belgium: 30 per 1,000,000 per year.[10] For comparison, populations with high levels of smoking can have a lung cancer incidence of over 1,000 per 1,000,000. Incidence of malignant mesothelioma lawsuit currently ranges from about 7 to 40 per 1,000,000 in industrialized Western nations, depending on the amount of asbestos lawsuit exposure of the populations during the past several decades.[11] It has been estimated that incidence may have peaked at 15 per 1,000,000 in the United States in 2004. Incidence is expected to continue increasing in other parts of the world. mesothelioma lawsuit occurs more often in men than in women and risk increases with age, but this disease can appear in either men or women at any age. Approximately one fifth to one third of all mesothelioma lawsuits are peritoneal.

Between 1940 and 1979, approximately 27.5 million people were occupationally exposed to asbestos lawsuit in the United States.[12] Between 1973 and 1984, there has been a threefold increase in the diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma lawsuit in Caucasian males. From 1980 to the late 1990s, the death rate from mesothelioma lawsuit in the USA increased from 2,000 per year to 3,000, with men four times more likely to acquire it than women. These rates may not be accurate, since it is possible that many cases of mesothelioma lawsuit are misdiagnosed as adenocarcinoma of the lung, which is difficult to differentiate from mesothelioma lawsuit.

Risk factors
Working with asbestos lawsuit is the major risk factor for mesothelioma lawsuit.[13] A history of asbestos lawsuit exposure exists in almost all cases. However, mesothelioma lawsuit has been reported in some individuals without any known exposure to asbestos lawsuit. In rare cases, mesothelioma lawsuit has also been associated with irradiation, intrapleural thorium dioxide (Thorotrast), and inhalation of other fibrous silicates, such as erionite.

asbestos lawsuit is the name of a group of minerals that occur naturally as masses of strong, flexible fibers that can be separated into thin threads and woven. asbestos lawsuit has been widely used in many industrial products, including cement, brake linings, roof shingles, flooring products, textiles, and insulation. If tiny asbestos lawsuit particles float in the air, especially during the manufacturing process, they may be inhaled or swallowed, and can cause serious health problems. In addition to mesothelioma lawsuit, exposure to asbestos lawsuit increases the risk of lung cancer, asbestos lawsuitis (a noncancerous, chronic lung ailment), and other cancers, such as those of the larynx and kidney.

The combination of smoking and asbestos lawsuit exposure significantly increases a person's risk of developing cancer of the airways (lung cancer, bronchial carcinoma). The Kent brand of cigarettes used asbestos lawsuit in its filters for the first few years of production in the 1950s and some cases of mesothelioma lawsuit have resulted. Smoking modern cigarettes does not appear to increase the risk of mesothelioma lawsuit.

Some studies suggest that simian virus 40 (SV40) may act as a cofactor in the development of mesothelioma lawsuit.[14]

asbestos lawsuit was known in antiquity, but it wasn't mined and widely used commercially until the late 1800s. Its use greatly increased during World War II. Since the early 1940s, millions of American workers have been exposed to asbestos lawsuit dust. Initially, the risks associated with asbestos lawsuit exposure were not publicly known. However, an increased risk of developing mesothelioma lawsuit was later found among shipyard workers, people who work in asbestos lawsuit mines and mills, producers of asbestos lawsuit products, workers in the heating and construction industries, and other tradespeople. Today, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) sets limits for acceptable levels of asbestos lawsuit exposure in the workplace, and created guidelines for engineering controls and respirators, protective clothing, exposure monitoring, hygiene facilities and practices, warning signs, labeling, recordkeeping, and medical exams. By contrast, the British Government's Health and Safety Executive (HSE) states formally that any threshold for mesothelioma lawsuit must be at a very low level and it is widely agreed that if any such threshold does exist at all, then it cannot currently be quantified. For practical purposes, therefore, HSE does not assume that any such threshold exists. People who work with asbestos lawsuit wear personal protective equipment to lower their risk of exposure.

Environmental exposures
Incidence of mesothelioma lawsuit had been found to be higher in populations living near naturally occurring asbestos lawsuit. For example, in central Cappadocia, Turkey, mesothelioma lawsuit was causing 50% of all deaths in three small villages — Tuzköy, Karain and Sarıhıdır. Initially, this was attributed to erionite, a zeolite mineral with similar properties to asbestos lawsuit, however, recently, detailed epidemiological investigation showed that erionite causes mesothelioma lawsuit mostly in families with a genetic predisposition.[15][16]

Exposure to asbestos lawsuit fibres has been recognized as an occupational health hazard since the early 1900s. Several epidemiological studies have associated exposure to asbestos lawsuit with the development of lesions such as asbestos lawsuit bodies in the sputum, pleural plaques, diffuse pleural thickening, asbestos lawsuitis, carcinoma of the lung and larynx, gastrointestinal tumours, and diffuse mesothelioma lawsuit of the pleura and peritoneum.

The documented presence of asbestos lawsuit fibres in water supplies and food products has fostered concerns about the possible impact of long-term and, as yet, unknown exposure of the general population to these fibres. Although many authorities consider brief or transient exposure to asbestos lawsuit fibres as inconsequential and an unlikely risk factor, some epidemiologists claim that there is no risk threshold. Cases of mesothelioma lawsuit have been found in people whose only exposure was breathing the air through ventilation systems. Other cases had very minimal (3 months or less) direct exposure.

Commercial asbestos lawsuit mining at Wittenoom, Western Australia, occurred between 1945 and 1966. A cohort study of miners employed at the mine reported that while no deaths occurred within the first 10 years after crocidolite exposure, 85 deaths attributable to mesothelioma lawsuit had occurred by 1985. By 1994, 539 reported deaths due to mesothelioma lawsuit had been reported in Western Australia.

Paraoccupational secondary exposure
Family members and others living with asbestos lawsuit workers have an increased risk of developing mesothelioma lawsuit, and possibly other asbestos lawsuit related diseases.[17] This risk may be the result of exposure to asbestos lawsuit dust brought home on the clothing and hair of asbestos lawsuit workers. To reduce the chance of exposing family members to asbestos lawsuit fibres, asbestos lawsuit workers are usually required to shower and change their clothing before leaving the workplace.

asbestos lawsuit in buildings
Many building materials used in both public and domestic premises prior to the banning of asbestos lawsuit may contain asbestos lawsuit. Those performing renovation works or DIY activities may expose themselves to asbestos lawsuit dust. In the UK use of Chrysotile asbestos lawsuit was banned at the end of 1999. Brown and blue asbestos lawsuit was banned in the UK around 1985. Buildings built or renovated prior to these dates may contain asbestos lawsuit materials.

Treatment of malignant mesothelioma lawsuit using conventional therapies in combination with radiation and or chemotherapy on stage I or II mesothelioma lawsuit have proved on average 74.6 percent successful in extending the patient's life span by five years or more [commonly known as remission][this percentage may increase or decrease depending on date of discovery / stage of malignant development] (Oncology Today, 2009). Treatment course is primarily determined by the staging or development. This is unlike traditional treatment such as surgery by itself which has proved only be 16.3 percent likely to extend a patient's life span by five years or more [commonly known as remission]. Clinical behavior of the malignancy is affected by several factors including the continuous mesothelial surface of the pleural cavity which favors local metastasis via exfoliated cells, invasion to underlying tissue and other organs within the pleural cavity, and the extremely long latency period between asbestos lawsuit exposure and development of the disease.

Surgery, by itself, has proved disappointing. However, research indicates varied success when used in combination with radiation and chemotherapy (Duke, 2008) A pleurectomy/decortication is the most common surgery, in which the lining of the chest is removed. Less common is an extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), in which the lung, lining of the inside of the chest, the hemi-diaphragm and the pericardium are removed.

 Wikibooks has a book on the topic of
Radiation Oncology/Lung/mesothelioma lawsuit
For patients with localized disease, and who can tolerate a radical surgery, radiation is often given post-operatively as a consolidative treatment. The entire hemi-thorax is treated with radiation therapy, often given simultaneously with chemotherapy. This approach of using surgery followed by radiation with chemotherapy has been pioneered by the thoracic oncology team at Brigham & Women's Hospital in Boston.[18] Delivering radiation and chemotherapy after a radical surgery has led to extended life expectancy in selected patient populations with some patients surviving more than 5 years. As part of a curative approach to mesothelioma lawsuit, radiotherapy is also commonly applied to the sites of chest drain insertion, in order to prevent growth of the tumor along the track in the chest wall.

Although mesothelioma lawsuit is generally resistant to curative treatment with radiotherapy alone, palliative treatment regimens are sometimes used to relieve symptoms arising from tumor growth, such as obstruction of a major blood vessel. Radiation therapy when given alone with curative intent has never been shown to improve survival from mesothelioma lawsuit. The necessary radiation dose to treat mesothelioma lawsuit that has not been surgically removed would be very toxic.

Chemotherapy is the only treatment for mesothelioma lawsuit that has been proven to improve survival in randomised and controlled trials. The landmark study published in 2003 by Vogelzang and colleagues compared cisplatin chemotherapy alone with a combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed (brand name Alimta) chemotherapy) in patients who had not received chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma lawsuit previously and were not candidates for more aggressive "curative" surgery.[19] This trial was the first to report a survival advantage from chemotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma lawsuit, showing a statistically significant improvement in median survival from 10 months in the patients treated with cisplatin alone to 13.3 months in the combination pemetrexed group in patients who received supplementation with folate and vitamin B12. Vitamin supplementation was given to most patients in the trial and pemetrexed related side effects were significantly less in patients receiving pemetrexed when they also received daily oral folate 500mcg and intramuscular vitamin B12 1000mcg every 9 weeks compared with patients receiving pemetrexed without vitamin supplementation. The objective response rate increased from 20% in the cisplatin group to 46% in the combination pemetrexed group. Some side effects such as nausea and vomiting, stomatitis, and diarrhoea were more common in the combination pemetrexed group but only affected a minority of patients and overall the combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin was well tolerated when patients received vitamin supplementation; both quality of life and lung function tests improved in the combination pemetrexed group. In February 2004, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved pemetrexed for treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma lawsuit. However, there are still unanswered questions about the optimal use of chemotherapy, including when to start treatment, and the optimal number of cycles to give.

Cisplatin in combination with raltitrexed has shown an improvement in survival similar to that reported for pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin, but raltitrexed is no longer commercially available for this indication. For patients unable to tolerate pemetrexed, cisplatin in combination with gemcitabine or vinorelbine is an alternative, or vinorelbine on its own, although a survival benefit has not been shown for these drugs. For patients in whom cisplatin cannot be used, carboplatin can be substituted but non-randomised data have shown lower response rates and high rates of haematological toxicity for carboplatin-based combinations, albeit with similar survival figures to patients receiving cisplatin.[20]

In January 2009, the United States FDA approved using conventional therapies such as surgery in combination with radiation and or chemotherapy on stage I or II mesothelioma lawsuit after research conducted by a nationwide study by Duke University concluded an almost 50 point increase in remission rates.

Treatment regimens involving immunotherapy have yielded variable results. For example, intrapleural inoculation of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in an attempt to boost the immune response, was found to be of no benefit to the patient (while it may benefit patients with bladder cancer). mesothelioma lawsuit cells proved susceptible to in vitro lysis by LAK cells following activation by interleukin-2 (IL-2), but patients undergoing this particular therapy experienced major side effects. Indeed, this trial was suspended in view of the unacceptably high levels of IL-2 toxicity and the severity of side effects such as fever and cachexia. Nonetheless, other trials involving interferon alpha have proved more encouraging with 20% of patients experiencing a greater than 50% reduction in tumor mass combined with minimal side effects.

Heated Intraoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
A procedure known as heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy was developed by Paul Sugarbaker at the Washington Cancer Institute.[21] The surgeon removes as much of the tumor as possible followed by the direct administration of a chemotherapy agent, heated to between 40 and 48°C, in the abdomen. The fluid is perfused for 60 to 120 minutes and then drained.

This technique permits the administration of high concentrations of selected drugs into the abdominal and pelvic surfaces. Heating the chemotherapy treatment increases the penetration of the drugs into tissues. Also, heating itself damages the malignant cells more than the normal cells.

Notable people who died from mesothelioma lawsuit
mesothelioma lawsuit, though rare, has had a number of notable patients. Hamilton Jordan, Chief of Staff for President Jimmy Carter and life long cancer activist, died in 2008. Australian anti-racism activist Bob Bellear died in 2005. British science fiction writer Michael G. Coney, responsible for nearly 100 works also died in 2005. American film and television actor Paul Gleason, perhaps best known for his portrayal of Principal Richard Vernon in the 1985 film The Breakfast Club, died in 2006. Mickie Most, an English record producer, died of mesothelioma lawsuit in 2003. Paul Rudolph, an American architect known for his cubist building designs, died in 1997.

Bernie Banton was an Australian workers' rights activist, who fought a long battle for compensation from James Hardie after he contracted mesothelioma lawsuit after working for that company. He claimed James Hardie knew of the dangers of asbestos lawsuit before he began work with the substance making insulation for power stations. mesothelioma lawsuit eventually took his life along with his brothers and hundreds of James Hardie workers. James Hardie made an undisclosed settlement with Banton only when his mesothelioma lawsuit had reached its final stages and he was expected to have no more than 48hrs to live. Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd mentioned Banton's extended struggle in his acceptance speech after winning the 2007 Australian federal election.

Steve McQueen was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma lawsuit on December 22, 1979. He was not offered surgery or chemotherapy because doctors felt the cancer was too advanced. McQueen sought alternative treatments from clinics in Mexico. He died of a heart attack on November 7, 1980, in Juárez, Mexico, following cancer surgery. He may have been exposed to asbestos lawsuit while serving with the U.S. Marines as a young adult—asbestos lawsuit was then commonly used to insulate ships' piping—or from its use as an insulating material in car racing suits.[22] (It is also reported that he worked in a shipyard during World War II, where he might have been exposed to asbestos lawsuit.[citation needed])

United States Congressman Bruce Vento died of mesothelioma lawsuit in 2000. The Bruce Vento Hopebuilder is awarded yearly by his wife at the MARF Symposium to persons or organizations who have done the most to support mesothelioma lawsuit research and advocacy.

After a long period of untreated illness and pain, rock and roll musician and songwriter Warren Zevon was diagnosed with inoperable mesothelioma lawsuit in the fall of 2002. Refusing treatments he believed might incapacitate him, Zevon focused his energies on recording his final album The Wind including the song "Keep Me in Your Heart," which speaks of his failing breath. Zevon died at his home in Los Angeles, California, on September 7, 2003.

Christie Hennessy, the influential Irish singer-songwriter, died of mesothelioma lawsuit in 2007, and had stridently refused to accept the prognosis in the weeks before his death.[23] His mesothelioma lawsuit has been attributed to his younger years spent working on building sites in London.[24][25]

Bob Miner, one of the founders of Software Development Labs, the forerunner of Oracle Corporation died of mesothelioma lawsuit in 1994.

Scottish Labour MP John William MacDougall died of mesothelioma lawsuit on August 13, 2008, after fighting the disease for two years.[26]

Canberra journalist and news presenter, Peter Leonard also succumbed to the condition on 23 September 2008.

Terrence McCann Olympic gold medalist and longtime Executive Director of Toastmasters, died of mesothelioma lawsuit on June 7, 2006 at his home in Dana Point, California.

Notable people who have lived for some time with mesothelioma lawsuit
Although life expectancy with this disease is typically limited, there are notable survivors. In July 1982, Stephen Jay Gould was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma lawsuit. After his diagnosis, Gould wrote the "The Median Isn't the Message"[27] for Discover magazine, in which he argued that statistics such as median survival are just useful abstractions, not destiny. Gould lived for another twenty years eventually succumbing to metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung, not mesothelioma lawsuit. Author Paul Kraus was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma lawsuit in July 1997. He was given a prognosis of less than a year to live and used a variety of complementary modalities. He continues to outlive his prognosis and wrote a book about his experience "Surviving mesothelioma lawsuit and Other Cancers: A Patient's Guide" [28] in which he presented his philosophy about healing and the decision making that led him to use integrative medicine.

Legal issues
Main article: asbestos lawsuit and the law
The first lawsuits against asbestos lawsuit manufacturers were in 1929. Since then, many lawsuits have been filed against asbestos lawsuit manufacturers and employers, for neglecting to implement safety measures after the links between asbestos lawsuit, asbestos lawsuitis, and mesothelioma lawsuit became known (some reports seem to place this as early as 1898). The liability resulting from the sheer number of lawsuits and people affected has reached billions of dollars.[29] The amounts and method of allocating compensation have been the source of many court cases, reaching up to the United States Supreme Court, and government attempts at resolution of existing and future cases. However, to date, the US Congress has not stepped in and there are no federal laws governing asbestos lawsuit compensation.[30]

Legal history
The first lawsuit against asbestos lawsuit manufacturers was brought in 1929. The parties settled that lawsuit, and as part of the agreement, the attorneys agreed not to pursue further cases. It was not until 1960 that an article published by Wagner et al. first officially established mesothelioma lawsuit as a disease arising from exposure to crocidolite asbestos lawsuit.[31] The article referred to over 30 case studies of people who had suffered from mesothelioma lawsuit in South Africa. Some exposures were transient and some were mine workers. However prior to 1950 malignant mesothelioma lawsuit was extremely rare and some experts even questioned its existence.[32] In 1962 McNulty reported the first diagnosed case of malignant mesothelioma lawsuit in an Australian asbestos lawsuit worker.[33] The worker had worked in the mill at the asbestos lawsuit mine in Wittenoom from 1948 to 1950.

In the town of Wittenoom, asbestos lawsuit-containing mine waste was used to cover schoolyards and playgrounds. In 1965 an article in the British Journal of Industrial Medicine established that people who lived in the neighbourhoods of asbestos lawsuit factories and mines, but did not work in them, had contracted mesothelioma lawsuit.

Despite proof that the dust associated with asbestos lawsuit mining and milling causes asbestos lawsuit-related disease, mining began at Wittenoom in 1943 and continued until 1966. In 1974 the first public warnings of the dangers of blue asbestos lawsuit were published in a cover story called "Is this Killer in Your Home?" in Australia's Bulletin magazine. In 1978 the Western Australian Government decided to phase out the town of Wittenoom, following the publication of a Health Dept. booklet, "The Health Hazard at Wittenoom", containing the results of air sampling and an appraisal of worldwide medical information.

By 1979 the first writs for negligence related to Wittenoom were issued against CSR and its subsidiary ABA, and the asbestos lawsuit Diseases Society was formed to represent the Wittenoom victims.

In Armley, Leeds, England the J W Roberts asbestos lawsuit incident involved several court cases against Turner & Newall where local residents who contracted mesothelioma lawsuit claimed compensation because of the asbestos lawsuit pollution from the company's factory. One notable case was that of June Hancock, who contracted the disease in 1993 and died in 1997.[34]

See also
mesothelioma lawsuit Applied Research Foundation
asbestos lawsuitis
This article uses information from a public domain U.S. National Cancer Institute fact sheet.
^ Ashrafian H, Athanasiou T, Yap J, DeSouza AC. Two-chamber intracardiac mesothelioma lawsuit. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2005 Jun;13(2):184-6.
^ Eastbourne Today. "Woman's death from asbestos lawsuit". Retrieved 2008-10-28. 
^ Muscat JE, Wynder EL (May 1991). "Cigarette smoking, asbestos lawsuit exposure, and malignant mesothelioma lawsuit". Cancer Res. 51 (9): 2263–7. PMID 2015590. cancerres.aacrjournals/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=2015590. 
^ Robinson BW, Creaney J, Lake R et al. (July 2005). "Soluble mesothelin-related protein—a blood test for mesothelioma lawsuit". Lung Cancer 49 Suppl 1: S109–11. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.03.020. PMID 15950789. 
^ Beyer, HL, , Glover CL et al. (April 2007). "MESOMARK: a potential test for malignant pleural mesothelioma lawsuit". Clinical Chemistry 53 (4): 666–672. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2006.079327. PMID 17289801. 
^ a b Ceresoli, GL, , Santoro A (July 2007). "Multidisciplinary treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma lawsuit". Oncologist 12 (7): 850–863. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.12-7-850. PMID 17673616. theoncologist.alphamedpress/cgi/content/full/12/7/850. 
^ Rusch, VW (October 1995). "A proposed new international TNM staging system for malignant pleural mesothelioma lawsuit". Chest 12 (7): 895–897. PMID 7555126. .chestjournal/content/108/4/1122.full.pdf. 
^ Roggli VL, Sharma A, Butnor KJ, Sporn T, Vollmer RT (2002). "Malignant mesothelioma lawsuit and occupational exposure to asbestos lawsuit: a clinicopathological correlation of 1445 cases". Ultrastruct Pathol 26 (2): 55–65. doi:10.1080/01913120252959227. PMID 12036093. 
^ .prwatch/prwissues/2001Q4/junkman.html
^ Bianchi, C; Bianchi T (June 2007). "Malignant mesothelioma lawsuit: global incidence and relationship with asbestos lawsuit". Industrial Health 45 (3): 379–387. doi:10.2486/indhealth.45.379. PMID 17634686. 
^ Robinson BW, Lake RA (October 2005). "Advances in malignant mesothelioma lawsuit". The New England Journal of Medicine 353 (15): 1591–603. doi:10.1056/NEJMra050152. PMID 16221782. 
^ .rand/pubs/documented_briefings/DB397/DB397.pdf
^ EBSCO database verified by URAC; accessed from Mount Sinai Hospital, New York
^ MacLachlan DS (2002). "SV40 in human tumors: new documents shed light on the apparent controversy". Anticancer Res 22 (6B): 3495–9. PMID 12552945. 
^ Dogan, Umran (2003). "mesothelioma lawsuit in Cappadocian villages". Indoor and Built Environment (Ankara: Sage) 12 (6): 367–375. doi:10.1177/1420326X03039065. ISSN: 1420-326X. .cababstractsplus/google/abstract.asp?AcNo=20033214031. Retrieved 2008-03-04. 
^ Carbone, Michelle; et al. (2007). "A mesothelioma lawsuit epidemic in Cappadocia: scientific developments and unexpected social outcomes". Nature Reviews Cancer 7 (2): 147–54. doi:10.1038/nrc2068. ISSN 1474-175X. .nature/nrc/journal/v7/n2/abs/nrc2068.html. Retrieved 2008-03-04. 
^ Protecting Workers' Families: A Research Agenda. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2002-113.
^ Sugarbaker DJ, Flores RM, Jaklitsch MT et al. (January 1999). "Resection margins, extrapleural nodal status, and cell type determine postoperative long-term survival in trimodality therapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma lawsuit: results in 183 patients". J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117 (1): 54–63; discussion 63–5. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70469-1. PMID 9869758. linkinghub.elsevier/retrieve/pii/S0022522399000720. 
^ Vogelzang N, Rusthoven J, Symanowski J, Denham C, Kaukel E, Ruffie P, et al. Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma lawsuit. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul;21(14):2636-44
^ Santoro A, O'Brien M, Stahel R, Nackaerts K, Baas P, Karthaus M, et al. Pemetrexed plus cisplatin or pemetrexed plus carboplatin for chemonaïve patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma lawsuit: results of the International Expanded Access Program. J Thorac Oncol. 2008 Jul;3(7):756-63.
^ Sugarbaker PH, Welch LS, Mohamed F, Glehen O (July 2003). "A review of peritoneal mesothelioma lawsuit at the Washington Cancer Institute". Surg Oncol Clin N Am 12 (3): 605–21, xi. doi:10.1016/S1055-3207(03)00045-0. PMID 14567020.
Online manual: Management of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy.
^ "McQueen's Legacy of Laetrile". New York Times. 2005-11-15. .nytimes/2005/11/15/health/15essa.html?ex=1289710800&en=8059981c17deec5d&ei=5088. 
^ RTE radio 1, Playback, 8 December
^ Irish singer Hennessy dies at 62 - BBC News - 11 December 2007
^ MP MacDougall dies after illness - BBC NEWS
^ Gould, Stephen Jay. "The Median Isn't the Message". 
^ Kraus, Paul. "Surviving mesothelioma lawsuit and Other Cancers: A Patient’s Guide". .survivingmesothelioma lawsuit. 
^ ORTIZ V. FIBREBOARD CORP. (97-1704) 527 U.S. 815 (1999) had individual liability from a single corporation and its insurance carriers of nearly $2 billion.
^ ORTIZ V. FIBREBOARD CORP. (97-1704) 527 U.S. 815 (1999)
^ Wagner JC, Sleggs CA, Marchand P (October 1960). "Diffuse pleural mesothelioma lawsuit and asbestos lawsuit exposure in the North Western Cape Province". Br J Ind Med. 17: 260–71. PMID 13782506. 
^ Alastair J Moore, Robert J Parker, John Wiggins (2008). "Malignant mesothelioma lawsuit". Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 3 (34): 1750–1172. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-3-34. PMID 19099560. PMC: PMC2652430. 
^ McNulty JC (December 1962). "Malignant pleural mesothelioma lawsuit in an asbestos lawsuit worker". Med J Aust 49(2): 953–4. PMID 13932248. 
^ "Case studies: June Hancock mesothelioma lawsuit case". Irwin Mitchells. .irwinmitchell/RecentWork/JuneHancockmesothelioma lawsuitCase.htm. Retrieved 2009-07-19. 
External links
ATSDR - Case Studies in Environmental Medicine: asbestos lawsuit Toxicity U.S. Department of Health and Human Service (public domain)
mesothelioma lawsuit: Questions and Answers from the U.S. National Cancer Institute Malignant mesothelioma lawsuit from the U.S. National Cancer Institute
mesothelioma lawsuit from the American Cancer Society
Malignant mesothelioma lawsuit review article from the American Cancer Society
Medlineplus: mesothelioma lawsuit from MEDLINE, part of the United States National Library of Medicine
Worksafe, Western Australia, from Western Australia's Department of Consumer and Employment Protection
US Nat'l Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, from the Centers for Disease Control
Australian mesothelioma lawsuit Register
What is mesothelioma lawsuit? Research and advocacy from the mesothelioma lawsuit Applied Research Foundation

Discuss this article in the forums (0 replies).

Ask An Attorney

Do I Have A Lawsuit?

Please enter your name.


Please enter your email address


Please enter your phone number


Please enter your city.


Select your state from the menu.

Zip Code(*)

Invalid Input

Have you already hired a lawyer(*)

Do you already have an attorney?

Briefly describe your complaint or legal questions.

Please briefly explain your complaint or legal question.

I understand that submission of contact and case information via this form does not establish nor constitute a contractual attorney-client relationship. An attorney will review this information and contact the submitter to establish a client-law firm relationship.