Do I Have A Lawsuit ?

Lawsuit Attorney Litigation News Legal Help Question And Answer Information And Support Community

Securities Fraud And Business Lawsuit Information

CellCyte Genetics said it will "defend itself vigorously" against three shareholder lawsuits filed this week, and announced it has hired Philadelphia-based law firm Duane Morris.

The suits allege executives and outside shareholders of the small biotechnology company artificially inflated its stock price and defrauded investors by making misleading claims.

Discuss this article in the forums (0 replies).

Oppenheimer Funds Savings Lawsuit
Oregon Attorney General John Kroger along with Treasurer Ben Westlund has taken action on behalf of the people of Oregon by filing a lawsuit in hopes of recovering investment losses in the Oppenheimer Funds 529 as well as Oregon College Savings plans. The $36.2 million lawsuit filed on Monday names : Oppenheimer Funds ,

Discuss this article in the forums (0 replies).

Countrywide Lawsuit

Bank of America subsidiary Countrywide financial has been hit with another lawsuit for misrepresenting the quality of securities it had been selling to investors prior to the financial melt down.

The lawsuit filed by a group of investors that include New York Life Insurance Co. as well as TIAA-CREF accuses Bank Of America of massive fraud related to the sale of mortgage securities.

The investors behind the lawsuit were led to believe that they were purchasing conservative investments that posed very little risk instead of the high risk loans that eventually led to significant losses for the investors.

Discuss this article in the forums (0 replies).

Zicam Investor Lawsuit

Supreme Court Ruling on Matrixx

zicam investor lawsuitIn a narrow judgment, the U.S. Supreme Court has declared that the class-action lawsuit filed by investors against Matrixx Initiatives Inc can proceed, declaring that the plaintiffs had shown enough of a claim for the case to go forward. The court ruling deals the pharmaceutical company a big defeat, declaring that the drugmaker had failed to reveal initial reports of adverse side effects from its Zicam remedy.

The Supreme Court of the United States has rejected limits to lawsuits against drug makers. The court ruled in favor of investors, who had filed a securities fraud class action against the manufacturer of the now-discontinued Zicam nasal cold remedies, alleging that the company violated the §10(b) Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule10b–5 by concealing 23 reports of people who had complained of loss of sense of smell after using Zicam as early 2004.

The investors alleged that the pharmaceutical company issued misleading statements on the possible link between Zicam Cold Remedy and loss of sense of smell. The U.S. Supreme Court judgment gives shareholders more leeway to file a lawsuit against pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for not disclosing reports of dangerous side effects of drugs manufactured by them.
In a unanimous judgment, the justices ruled that the petitioners had every right to be informed of the side effects of the Zicam nasal spray and gel, manufactured by Matrixx. The judges declared that Matrixx should defend against these accusations of fraud, which claimed that it failed to disclose the side effects of its spray and gel. The high court ruled that, under the federal securities law, even less definitive evidence of side effects is enough to require disclosure.

The lawsuit also cites nine other lawsuits filed by people affected by recalled Zicam nasal products from October 2003 to January 2004, alleging that the drug maker either omitted or concealed material information about the safety of the Zicam products. Numerous consumer lawsuits have also been filed against the pharmaceutical company for “product liability, negligence, fraud, and breach of warranties.”

The Supreme Court ruling has made it easier for investors to take pharmaceutical companies court for deliberately withholding information about a drug or product.

Discuss this article in the forums (0 replies).

Merck Lawsuit Settlement

International drug maker Merck & Co. has settled a shareholder lawsuit over the release of a potentially damaging study on the drug Vytorin.

At the center of this particular 4 year old lawsuit is shareholders claim that Merck & Co. delayed releasing the results of a study that Merck & Co had hoped would boost sells of it’s high cholesterol drug Vytorin. The study instead revealed data that would likely slow future sells of Vytorin.

The Vytorin ENHANCE study results revealed that Vytorin was equally effective at reducing plaque buildup as its one of its drug components in stand alone form. The study showed Zocor, one of the two components in Vytorin was just as effective when used alone as it is as a sub-component of Vytorin.

Vytorin has been a multi billion dollar seller for Merck and this is possibly the reasoning behind withholding of study data from patients and the public in general.

Discuss this article in the forums (0 replies).
Page 1 of 2

Ask An Attorney

Do I Have A Lawsuit?

Please enter your name.


Please enter your email address


Please enter your phone number


Please enter your city.


Select your state from the menu.

Zip Code(*)

Invalid Input

Have you already hired a lawyer(*)

Do you already have an attorney?

Briefly describe your complaint or legal questions.

Please briefly explain your complaint or legal question.

I understand that submission of contact and case information via this form does not establish nor constitute a contractual attorney-client relationship. An attorney will review this information and contact the submitter to establish a client-law firm relationship.