devry lawsuit settlement

DeVry Lawsuit Settlement Information:

 

Settlement Amount: $100 Million

Broken down As Follows:

 

  • $49.4 million for partial refunds to individuals who have previously paid for classes with DeVry

  • $50.6 million for debt and loan forgiveness for victims who owe Devry money.

Under terms reached with lawyers for the FTC, DeVry University must cancel any and all unpaid loans or balances owed by current and former students between the dates of September 1st 2008 and September 30th 2015.

Additionally, the lawsuit settlement forces DeVry to cancel over  $20 million in debts owed to DeVry University by students for tuition, books, fees and other certain expenses.

 

DeVry University has been instructed to contact lawsuit beneficiaries via email within 30 days of the lawsuit settlement judgement being entered.

The FTC has made the following press release available to Do I Have A lawsuit and other true information or news providers for immediate release:

Log in to comment
Discuss this article in the forums (0 replies).

Everett Washington OxyContin Lawsuit

 

Opioid Addiction LawsuitOn Thursday, January 19th, 2017, the city of Everett WA, filed a state lawsuit against drug maker Purdue Pharma with allegations the drug manufacturer was and continue to be a major contributing factor to opioid addiction and resultant community expenses and impact.

 

Everett city officials initiating the lawsuit on behalf of their constituents, seek to hold Purdue Pharma accountable for failing to take proactive steps in preventing OxyContin from entering the black market as an addictive drug that is commonly referenced as a major source of growing Opioid addictions across the United States.

 

The lawsuit alleges that as a result of Purdue Pharma being negligent in failing to properly institute effective controls on OxyContin, the drug was inadvertently distributed from Purdue to drug dealers, pill mills, and narcotic rings. As a result, the city of Everett has incurred substantial financial expense relating to treatment and medical care associated with OxyContin drug addiction victims.

 

Everett city officials contend that OxyContin addiction in their jurisdiction has a social impact on the community and costs taxpayers at nearly every department of local government, specifically via increase costs for treatment programs, police, incarcerations, and other city services.

 

In response, Purdue Pharma claims to have taken steps to prevent and address Oxycontin addiction which makes up 2% of all opioid prescriptions. In declaring Purdue Pharma an industry leader in opioid abuse prevention, Purdue acknowledged that it shares the nationwide concern over opioid addiction and abuse with city officials.

 

Regardless, the mayor of Everett was indifferent to Purdue Pharma excuses and stated “We are going to go at them, and we are going to go at them hard”

How hard, is yet to be seen as many legal experts consider the styling of this lawsuit to be a longshot.

 

If successful in obtaining damages from the drug maker, the city of Evertt will lay the groundwork for future litigation against drug manufacturers contributing to the opioid addiction afflicting our nation.

 

Do I Have A Lawsuit will continue to monitor developments in this case.

What Is Oxycontin?

Oxycontin is a painkiller opioid controlled release form of Oxycodone.

 

Do other drugs contain Oxycodone, if so what are they?

Other prescription drugs containing Oxycodone

  • Roxicodone

  • OxyIR

  • Percolone

  • Percocet

  • Endocet

  • Percodan

  • Endodan

  • Percodan-Demi

  • Roxiprin

  • Combunox

  • Targiniq ER

  • Troxyca ER

 

What are common side effects associated with Oxycodone:

Chills:

Chills is a feeling of coldness occurring during a high fever, but sometimes is also a common symptom which occurs alone in specific people. It occurs during fever due to the release of cytokines and prostaglandins as part of the inflammatory response, which increases the set point for body temperature in the hypothalamus. The increased set point causes the body temperature to rise (pyrexia), but also makes the patient feel cold or chills until the new set point is reached. Shivering also occurs along with chills because the patient's body produces heat during muscle contraction in a physiological attempt to increase body temperature to the new set point. When it does not accompany a high fever, it is normally a light chill. Sometimes a chill of medium power and short duration may occur during a scare, especially in scares of fear, commonly interpreted like or confused by trembling. Severe chills with violent shivering are called rigors.

 

Cold Sweats

concurrent perspiration and chill usually associated with fear, pain, or shock

 

Confusion

The term "acute mental confusion" is often used interchangeably with delirium in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems and the Medical Subject Headings publications to describe the pathology. These refer to the loss of orientation, or the ability to place oneself correctly in the world by time, location and personal identity. Mental confusion is sometimes accompanied by disordered consciousness (the loss of linear thinking) and memory loss (the ability to correctly recall previous events or learn new material.

Difficult and or labored breathing

Labored breathing is distinguished from shortness of breath or dyspnea, which is the sensation of respiratory distress rather than a physical presentation.

 

Still, many simply define dyspnea as difficulty in breathing without further specification, which may confuse it with e.g. labored breathing or tachypnea (rapid breathing). Labored breathing has occasionally been included in the definition of dyspnea as well. However, in the standard definition, these related signs may be present at the same time, but don't necessarily have to be. For instance, in respiratory arrest by a primary failure in respiratory muscles the patient, if conscious, may experience dyspnea, yet without having any labored breathing or tachypnea. The other way around, labored breathing or tachypnea can voluntarily be performed even when there is no dyspnea.

 

Lightheadedness

Lightheadedness is a common and typically unpleasant sensation of dizziness and/or a feeling that one may faint. The sensation of lightheadedness can be short-lived, prolonged, or, rarely, recurring. In addition to dizziness, the individual may feel as though his or her head is weightless. The individual may also feel as though the room is what causes the "spinning" or moving (vertigo) associated with lightheadedness. Most causes of lightheadedness are not serious and either cure themselves quickly or are easily treated.

 

Keeping a sense of balance requires the brain to process a variety of information received from the eyes, the nervous system, and the inner ears. If the brain is unable to process these signals, such as when the messages are contradictory, or if the sensory systems are improperly functioning, an individual may experience lightheadedness or dizziness.

Log in to comment
Discuss this article in the forums (0 replies).

Class Action Lawsuit Attorney

 

Hal Rosner was apoplectic.

The Scripps Ranch lawyer turned ever-darker shades of pink as he outlined what he called the U.S. Supreme Court’s war against consumers. He was brandishing a 28-inch, yellow automobile purchase contract and waving it like a pennant.

“It’s a basic, fundamental attack on the United States Constitution, and it’s why our Supreme Court should walk around with shame,” Rosner said. “Our Supreme Court violated the United States constitutional right to jury trial like a group of little whores.”

Rosner’s a trial lawyer, so it’s fair to chalk up some of his outrage down to the natural theatrics of his profession.

But he’s also got good reason to be mad. And so do consumers.

In a game-changing 2011 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court dealt a huge blow to consumer advocates. In a 5-4 ruling, the court essentially said that not only is it OK for companies to put clauses in their contracts forcing customers to settle disputes in private arbitration, but they can also bar customers from bringing class action lawsuits against them or even arbitrating their disputes as a class.

The decision in the case, AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, a class action lawsuit that originated in San Diego, involved customers who had been charged small amounts for phones advertised as “free,” overturned years of law developed in the California Legislature and upheld by its courts to protect consumers against a seemingly unstoppable trend.

For decades, businesses across the country have increasingly been writing their way out of the judicial system. By inserting “mandatory arbitration clauses” into their contracts, companies ranging from auto dealers to cell phone companies to health care providers have cut off their customers’ access to the courts, forcing them instead to settle disputes in private arbitration.

That has long concerned consumer advocates and even some industry insiders, who say arbitration is biased in favor of big business. But, for many observers, those worries are nothing compared with the Supreme Court’s 2011 decision.

“It’s earth-shattering. It takes away your right to hold companies accountable for transactions that we all engage in every day,” said Deepak Gupta, one of the attorneys who represented the plaintiffs in the Concepcion case before the Supreme Court. “We all assume that we have a right to hold a company accountable if they’re cheating us. We assume the consumer protection laws will apply. What’s frustrating is the average person doesn’t know that when they take out a contract … they’ve given away their rights.”

The Golden State for Consumer Protection

Historically, California hasn’t been a bad place to be a consumer.

The legislature in the Golden State has spent the last few decades trying to protect the little guys, and successive big court decisions have upheld consumer rights. Legal Leads

In the 1990s and early 2000s, as mandatory arbitration clauses became all the rage for corporations across the country, the California Legislature pounced, passing a slew of laws in 2002 aimed at protecting consumers from the ever-growing trend toward private justice. (Though one of the key laws has since been widely ignored by much of the arbitration industry).

The activism wasn’t limited to lawmakers. Several high-profile lawsuits concerning arbitration clauses found their way to the California Supreme Court. The granddaddy of these was a case called Discover Bank v. Superior Court, in 2005.

The California Supreme Court ruled in that case that companies couldn’t put blanket bans on class action lawsuits in their contracts. To do so was “unconscionable” in legalese. It wouldn’t fly.

Over the next few years, at least 13 other states ruled that blanket class action bans by companies were illegal, according to a research paper by Myriam Gilles of the Cardozo School of Law and Gary Friedman, a New York attorney.

Then, in 2011, California’s groundbreaking rules were put to the ultimate legal test.

The Concepcion case originated in 2006, when a San Diego couple, Vincent and Liza Concepcion, signed a deal offered by AT&T to receive a “free” phone if they signed a two-year cell phone contract. The couple was later charged $30.22 in sales tax for the phone, and they sued AT&T in a class action.

Log in to comment
Discuss this article in the forums (0 replies).

The below article was originally written by Forbes contributor Tara Haelle and republished here ( with attribution)  on doihavealawsuit.com as its contents are of serious importance and deserving of any efforts to promote public awareness.

Asbestos is a well documented, studied and proven cause of cancer. There is no safe level of airborne Asbestos exposure and we encourage anyone who has been exposed to Asbestos to seek medical monitoring and potentially legal representation if your exposure was a direct result of negligence on behalf of a third party.

Be aware, educated and safe… your safety is your first responsibility.  

Article By Tara Haelle for Forbes:

 

Asbestos Still Causes Cancer. Why Is It Still Used?

 

Tara Haelle,  

Asbestos Causes Terminal CancerI offer straight talk on science, medicine, health and vaccines.  

Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own.

"When she was in elementary school, Heather Von St. James would head out to feed and play with the family’s rabbits, kept in a hutch in her father’s garage workshop. In the frequently chilly air of the Black Hills of South Dakota, she’d slip into her dad’s warm work coat before heading out. The coat swallowed her up at 7 and 8 years old, but it was conveniently hanging on the door in the entryway for her to grab if she went out to check the mail or grab the newspaper.

It wasn’t until nearly three decades later, after Heather had had her own child, that the consequences of wearing her dad’s work coat came to fruition: just three months after giving birth to her daughter, Heather was diagnosed with a rare form of cancer known as mesothelioma. Unknown to her and her dad, his work in construction, working with drywall and concrete materials, regularly exposed him to asbestos.

His coat was filled with tiny fibers that made their way into Heather’s lungs and eventually developed into a form of cancer almost exclusively caused by asbestos exposure. Heather underwent chemotherapy and surgery, but she lost her left lung—and, eventually, her father. 

He died in 2014 from renal carcinoma, a different cancer also linked to asbestos exposure.

Asbestos refers to six types of minerals made from tiny, lightweight but strong fireproof fibers. That makes them tremendously useful for thousands of products—except that they kill. 

At least 80% of people diagnosed with mesothelioma have had confirmed exposure to asbestos. Others likely had exposure without realizing it since it can take decades, even up to 50 or 70 years, before mesothelioma develops in the thin lining of the lungs, chest, abdomen and heart.

Heather was fortunate—she passed the 10-year survival mark just over a year ago—but about half of patients die within a year after malignant mesothelioma diagnosis. And inexplicably, those deaths are increasing, reported the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention earlier this month. Deaths from mesothelioma were expected to begin decreasing after 2005, but instead, they slightly ticked up from 2,479 deaths in 1999 to 2,597 deaths in 2015.

Many of the deaths occurred among people at least 85 years old, which makes sense given how widespread asbestos was, particularly before the 1980s, and how long the disease takes to develop. 

The material was commonly used in a range of industries, such as construction, manufacturing, mining, milling and shipbuilding, but it was also found in many other products, including household goods.

Asbestos was banned from use in insulation products in the 1970s, but it remains in many old buildings. Today, the Toxic Substances Control Act bans asbestos in various paper and flooring products, as well as any newly developed products that have no history of asbestos in their manufacturing.

Still, it’s not completely banned, despite calls from public health researchers to do so, perhaps explaining why deaths continue among individuals under 55 years old, the CDC researchers reported.

“Although most deaths from malignant mesothelioma in the United States are the result of exposures to asbestos 20–40 years prior, new cases might result from occupational exposure to asbestos fibers during maintenance activities, demolition and remediation of existing asbestos in structures, installations and buildings if controls are insufficient to protect workers,” the researchers wrote.

compliments of Heather Von St. James:

Heather Von St. James learned she had mesothelioma, a rare cancer caused largely by asbestos exposure, just a few months after her daughter's birth.

The CDC report notes that one in five air samples collected in the construction industry in 2003 exceeded the limits allowed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 

And if workers are unprotected, they could be bringing asbestos fibers home just as Heather’s dad did, leaving family members of workers at risk for asbestos exposure as well.

More than a dozen products, from cement products to clothing to car parts, are still manufactured with asbestos. The U.S. isn’t alone in continuing to allow its use. According to a study a few years ago, just 44 out of 143 countries that used asbestos in the 2000s have since banned its use.

The Environmental Protection Agency lists the many places asbestos might be found, including roofing and shingles products, vinyl flooring products, pipes, oil and coal furnaces, certain types of paint, heat-resistant fabrics and car parts exposed to friction, such as brakes. 

The symptoms of mesothelioma can resemble the early symptoms of many other illnesses, such as fatigue and fever, but they also include difficulty breathing, muscle weakness and chest pain. More information about asbestos can be found at the EPA and National Cancer Institute and more information on mesothelioma can be found at the American Cancer Society."

Log in to comment
Discuss this article in the forums (0 replies).

Toyota Class Action Lawsuit Settlement 

Toyota Class Action Lawsuit SettlementAfter more than two years of hard work by attorneys , investigators , professional specialist and engineers working in conjunction with the law firm staff required to win in these major class action lawsuits filed against large corporations … Do I Have A Lawsuit can now announce that a settlement has been reached in the Toyota Class Action Lawsuit cases related to defective acceleration systems in their vehicles that were causing some models to accelerate unexpectedly.

The Toyota Class Action Lawsuit has been settled for over 1.2 billion dollars and is now possibly the largest lawsuit settlement amount in United States history for any type of litigation involving motor vehicle recalls or automobile defects.

While there had been reports of personal injury as a result of the defects the primary basis of the lawsuit was the fact that as a result of these defective acceleration systems , owners of Toyota vehicles were subject to a reduction in resale / ownership value of their vehicles as a result of the defect.

The settlement will bring to an end the hundreds of lawsuits filed by Toyota owners against the automobile manufacturer as a result of these defective systems.

Do I Have A Lawsuit readers , supporters and network attorneys should note that although this settlement has been proposed and will likely be signed off on. We must still await approval by U.S. District Judge James Selna and we expect that he will review the proposed class action lawsuit settlement on Friday.

Readers should also note that although all cases were consolidated in U.S. District Court in santa Ana, this settlement does not include cases where injury or death was a result of Toyota vehicles accelerating on their own. Those accident and personal injury lawsuit cases are scheduled to be heard during court trials starting in February 2013.

This settlement pertains to those of you who suffered economic loss as a result of vehicle devaluation only.

Log in to comment
Discuss this article in the forums (0 replies).