Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Lawyer
Surgical Error Malpractice Lawsuit
- Details
- Parent Category: Lawsuit News Alerts
- Category: Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Lawyer
Surgical Error Malpractice Lawsuit
Surgical Error Lawsuit
On February 17, 2012, a surgical error lawsuit filed in a Chicago court resulted in $7.5 million award to the family of an Illinois man, who died following a robotic surgery on his spleen. A month prior to the judgment, a Clark County jury awarded $1.5 million to a 30-year-old woman who suffered from a permanent debilitating condition because of late surgery. About 12,000 patients die and millions others face medical conditions caused by surgical errors in the United States every year due to wrong surgery, surgical lapses leading to infection or removal of body parts, surgical error resulting in injury and death, delay in surgery, incorrect procedure, post-surgery medication errors, and surgical instruments left in the body during the procedure. According to a report by the Office of Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services, more than 80% of surgical error cases go unreported.
Surgical errors fall under medical malpractice, and victims have every right to seek justice. They are entitled to file surgical error lawsuits claiming damages for injuries caused due to surgical mistakes or failure of doctors or hospital staff to take complete medical care of patients they are operating on.
Surgical Error: Meaning and Types
Most of the surgical error lawsuits claim damages citing negligence by doctors during the operation, inadequate care by hospital staff, and wrong surgical procedure. A surgical error is a medical mistake caused on the operating table, leading to injuries to a patient that could have been prevented. The court judgments in various surgical error lawsuits have expanded the definition of surgery mistakes to include injuries caused due to medical negligence prior to and after an operation. One can sue a surgeon or hospital for,
- pre-operative surgical errors caused by failure to properly diagnose a medical condition requiring surgery and suggest the most effective procedure to be adopted. There are instances where wrong diagnosis or faulty pathology report resulted in unnecessary surgery of patients. Doctors preferring surgery to medication are also liable to be sued for wrong suggestion.
- surgical errors during the operation caused due to wrong surgical procedure, inexperienced doctors and staff, lack of attention, wrong organ removal, incorrect incisions, wrong site surgery, anesthesia error, use of faulty or unsterilized equipment, or instruments left inside the patient’s body.
- post-operative surgical injuries caused due to inadequate care by hospital, wrong medication, preventable infections, or inexperienced doctors, or improper handling of surgery requiring a patient to undergo surgery again.
Grounds for Filing Surgical Error Lawsuit
A patient undergoes a lot of physical and financial strain before and after a surgery. They suffer from further injuries and medical complications if the surgery goes wrong because of mistakes on the part of doctors or the hospital. The law of the land allows them or their family to file a surgical error lawsuit seeking punitive damages for those responsible for professional negligence and medical malpractice that resulted in the injury.
Wrongful Birth Lawsuit
- Details
- Parent Category: Lawsuit News Alerts
- Category: Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Lawyer
Wrongful Birth Lawsuit
In a complex case, the parents of a child born with cystic fibrosis has filed a lawsuit seeking damages as a result of health care providers failure to provide the most basic care in the form of prenatal testing that would have alerted the couple to the fact that their child would be born with the fatal disease.
The parents in this case are seeking damages for the mental and emotional distress caused by those health care providers when they failed to test , diagnose and inform the couple of their child's cystic fibrosis diagnosis. They will undoubtedly face additional healthcare ciosts in caring for the terminaly ill child and seek justice in the courts as a means to help pay for these expenses.
Montana health care providers have moved to have this case dismissed on the grounds of lack of precedent in situations of wrongful birth , and have stated that this lawsuit raises both moral and political questions that should probably be addressed by state and federal laws before any form of lawsuit can proceed.
Defendants named in the lawsuit include nurse Peggy Scanson , Livingston Healthcare , Bozeman OB/GYN , Dr. William Peters, Bozeman Deaconess Health Services and Shodair Children’s Hospital Department of Medical Genetics. Damages from this lawsuit will be determined by a jury.
The couple stated that they were provided with a report indicating that the baby was healthy.
IV Medical Malpractice Lawsuit
- Details
- Parent Category: Lawsuit News Alerts
- Category: Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Lawyer
IV Medical Malpractice Lawsuit
Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Against Advocate Lutheran General Hospital Over Death of 6-Week-Old Infant
A couple, Fritzie and Cameron Burkett, from Chicago has filed a medical malpractice and negligence lawsuit in the Cook County Circuit Court against Advocate Lutheran General Hospital in Illinois for the death of their 40 day old infant, who was administered 60 times the prescribed dosage of sodium chloride at the hospital.
The lawsuit seeks full and fair compensation for the grave loss and agony suffered by the parents of the infant Genesis Burkett, who would have been a happy six month old child had the hospital error and oversight not caused his death on October 16, 2010.
The lawsuit alleges that the hospital staff gave their premature son an intravenous bag filled with 60 times more than the prescribed sodium chloride dosage, which proved fatal for their son, causing him immense suffering and heart stroke. The lawsuit claims that, despite having born premature, the deceased, who weighed only one pound and eight ounces, was “making good progress” before his life was cut short by the hospital error and oversight.
Medical Malpractice Lawsuit
- Details
- Parent Category: Lawsuit News Alerts
- Category: Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Lawyer
Medical Malpractice Lawsuit
Medical Malpractice Lawsuit
In what can be called the height of medical malpractice and negligence, an eye surgeon first operated four-year-old Jesse on the wrong eye and then on the correct eye. Parents of the child, considering a medical malpractice lawsuit against the guilty doctor, accuse him of negligence and failure to properly inform them about the surgery and blame him for the unnecessary side effects on the vision of their boy.
The parents contend that their son as suffering from a wandering right eye and thus needed the operation. However, they claim that even after the surgery, no improvement has been noted; rather, the wrong surgery has left the left eye wandering. They allege that the negligent doctor informed them about the surgery on both eyes only after having operated the wrong eye.
On the other hand, the guilty doctor admits that she “lost sense of direction” and operated the wrong eye. She blamed her assistant for “accidentally” rubbing off the spot to mark the correct eye for the surgery.
Such a gross negligence and medical practice calls for punishment of the offender.
Medical Malpractice Statistics
This is not the only medical malpractice incident of its kind in the country. Unnecessary surgeries, hospital errors, doctor’s negligence, wrong diagnosis contribute to the rising medical malpractice statistics. In fact, it is the third leading cause of death in the United States. According to the Journal of American Medicine, more than 225,000 patients lose their lives annually from medical errors – 106,000 from prescription drug side effects, 80,000 from hospital infections, 12,000 from unneeded surgeries, and 7,000 from wrong diagnosis.
Further, cost of health care, lost wages due to medical malpractice stands at about $25 billion annually. Statistics reveal that more than 8,000 physicians and doctors commit malpractice errors annually and of every eight malpractice injuries, only one malpractice claim is made.
Let us have a look at some of the medical practice and negligence cases, some of which are awaiting justice, while some others have gone in favor of the plaintiffs.
Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Awarded in Favor of Plaintiffs
Recently, a plaintiff in a medical malpractice lawsuit has won a big award at the Erie County Courthouse. The lawsuit accused two physicians of medical malpractice in the case of Carolyn Champlin for failing to properly diagnose that she was suffering from lung cancer, which “went from operable and curable to inoperable and incurable," after which she died in April 2005. The jury found both doctors guilty of negligence and wrong diagnosis and returned a $1.8 million verdict in favor of the plaintiff.
In another medical malpractice case, the jury has recently awarded $21.6 million to the plaintiff, who claimed botched delivery of her son at Hamot hospital, resulting in brain damage and cerebral palsy to the child, as the hospital staff did not do enough to supply oxygen to the child at the time of delivery. While giving the verdict, which is the largest in the history of Erie County, the jury found the defendant hospital guilty of malpractice, which left the child profoundly disabled for life and permanently under the care of others. The verdict includes compensation for the past medical expenses and lost lifetime earning capacity, besides his future medical expenses.
In another similar case, a doctor who failed to properly diagnose colon cancer in a patient faces medical negligence lawsuit. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant did not conduct the required tests on him to diagnose his colon cancer, due to which he could not get timely treatment, causing him pain and suffering and decreased life expectancy. The jury awarded $2.5 million verdict in favor of the plaintiff.
A DuPage County jury awarded a medical negligence lawsuit an $11.5 million award. The plaintiff alleged medical negligence on the part of the Naperville's Edward Hospital staff at the time of her delivery, which caused death of her unborn child and loss of her small intestine. The plaintiff alleges that due to the negligence of the medical staff, she cannot become pregnant again. The jury found the hospital guilty of negligence and awarded the lawsuit to the plaintiff.
Rising Number of Medical Malpractice Lawsuits
Recently, a Chicago couple has filed a malpractice and negligence suit in the Cook County Circuit Court against a renowned hospital in Illinois, alleging that the hospital staff administered 60 times the prescribed dosage of sodium chloride to their 40-year-old infant, which caused his death. The plaintiffs seek unspecified damages against the Advocate Lutheran General Hospital for its staff’s negligence in conducting proper medical care of their infant, who was recovering well from a premature birth, which has caused them immense pain and incredible loss.
In another medical malpractice lawsuit filed against an Indiana doctor Mark Weinberger, the plaintiff alleges negligence and noncompliance with the standard of care on the part of the defendant in diagnosing that the victims was suffering from lung cancer. The lawsuit accuses the defendant of conducting an unnecessary sinus surgery on her, which resulted in serious complications for the victim and she died. The victim’s daughter who has sued the doctor seeks millions in punitive damages and compensation for the unneeded surgery, which cost her mother over $500,000 on medical bills and loss of projected lifetime earnings, besides the loss of her life.
In another such case, the jury sided with the plaintiff, a 20-year-old male, in deciding the outcome of the medical malpractice case against the Cook County Hospital. The plaintiff alleged that during the time of his birth, the hospital staff unnecessarily delayed the delivery, causing him permanent brain damage. The jury found the hospital guilty of negligence in giving timely care to the mother at the time of labor and delivery, which resulted in brain damage to the fetus.
In another medical negligence case against a Chicago-area hospital, a nurse midwife, and a sponsoring obstetrician, the plaintiff claimed that the child suffered brain injury at birth due to hypoxia, causing him cerebral palsy. The lawsuit alleged that the midwife did not perform intrauterine resuscitation immediately before the baby's birth even as the fetal heart rate was constantly dropping. The plaintiff contended that the back-up obstetrician could not properly perform the required procedure of providing oxygen and blood supply to the fetus, causing fetal distress. The lawsuit alleged that the hospital failed to provide a registered surgeon for the delivery of the baby. The case was settled before it went for trial, and the defendant hospital offered unspecified damages to the plaintiff for settling the case.
Medical Malpractice Lawsuit
- Details
- Parent Category: Lawsuit News Alerts
- Category: Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Lawyer
Medical Malpractice Lawsuit
An Indiana doctor Mark Weinberger faces medical malpractice and negligence lawsuit for the death of Phyllis Barnes of Valparaiso. Besides, the guilty doctor, also known as the “nose doctor,” faces 22 counts of health care fraud for billing insurance companies for surgical procedures allegedly performed on more than 100 patients, which he actually did not perform. His trial is scheduled for Monday in Lake Superior Court, Hammond. The Barnes lawsuit claims that the defendant failed to identify the disease the victim was suffering from, which resulted in her death. The plaintiff, who is the deceased’s daughter, seeks compensation for the unnecessary surgery on which her mother had spent over $500,000 on medical bills and lost more than $1 million in projected lifetime earnings. The plaintiff seeks millions in punitive damages for the suffering and pain her mother had to undergo as well as for the loss of her life.
The lawsuit asserts that the defendant failed to diagnose that the victim was suffering from lung cancer and rather treated her for sinus, following which her situation complicated and she died. The lawsuit contends that the defendant did not follow medical guidelines required for the treatment of the victim, nor did he comply with the standard of care, which resulted in her death.
The lawsuit claims that the defendant performed needless sinus` surgery on the victim and failed to detect her cancer while she was under his care. The lawsuit contends that the victim was unnecessarily harmed due to delay in diagnosis. The plaintiff claims that despite being more than qualified to identify the victim’s cancer on the first visit, the defendant did not provide her with the required diagnosis. The plaintiff, who is the victim’s daughter, says that the defendant doctor failed to diagnose her cancer, as a result of which the 50-year-old died on September 16, 2004.

