Side Effects Lawsuit
Mirena IUD Lawsuit Mirena Birth Control IUD Recall Lawsuit
Mirena IUD Perforation Defect IUD Birth Control Lawsuit
On December 17, 2012, a Kentucky woman filed a Mirena IUD birthe control lawsuit against Bayer, alleging that the defective design of the contraceptive device caused it to migrate from its place of implant that resulted in acute abdominal pain and other health problems. She had to undergo surgery to remove the Mirena birth control IUD device located at the right posterior. Three similar Mirena IUD lawsuits filed in November 2012 by women from Florida, Ohio, and California claimed that the plaintiffs suffered from uterine wall perforation following the migration of intrauterine contraceptives they were implanted with. The women had to undergo hysterectomy to remove the birth control devices and suffered from no-viable pregnancy.
These lawsuits are part of dozens of product liability litigations filed across the United States alleging injuries and serious health problems caused by the Mirena IUD. All such claims belittle insistence of the manufacturer that the contraceptive is safer and hassle free to be inserted directly into the uterus, where it remains in place and prevents pregnancy for up to five years.
Hip Replacement Implant Recall Lawsuit Attorney Hip Implant Side Effects
Hip Replacement Implant Recall Information
Everything You Need To Know About Defective Hip Replacement Implant Recalls ... If you HAVE Questions About Any Information Here, Please Contact Us.
The FDA has received more than 17,000 complaints highlighting large-scale failure and side effects of hip implants in the last one decade. The metal particles released by these artificial hip implants have been blamed for cardiovascular, thyroid, metal poisoning, and nervous system problems, while their failure in less than expected time and fracture rates necessitated patients to undergo revision or secondary surgeries. In May 2011, the FDA called for complete assessment of safety concerns associated with metal hip implant systems and components of 21 manufacturers. Recalls over all these years prompted by regulator warnings and revelations of independent studies have led to filing of thousands of hip implant lawsuits claiming product liability against manufacturers. A Forbes report published in December 2011 estimated that the total number of hip implant lawsuits would cross 30,000, costing the industry $5 billion in settlements.
DePuy ASR Hip Replacement Implant Recall
Merck Coppertone Class Action Lawsuit Settlement
New Jersey-based pharmaceutical major Merck & Co had agreed to settle the Coppertone class action lawsuit that was filed nine years ago. According to reports, the total compensation is expected to be between $3 million and $10 million, with each plaintiff expected to get up to $1.50 million for each Coppertone product purchased. The settlement agreed on September 21, 2012 also forbids Merck from using specific words, such as waterproof, all day protection, sweat proof, and sunblock in product labels, advertisements, and marketing material promoting Coppertone sunscreens in the United States.
What is The Merck Coppertone Class Action Lawsuit
Coppertone sunscreen lotion was originally owned by Schering-Plough, the manufacturer of foot care brand Dr Scholls and other pharmaceutical drugs. The suntan lotion brand came under increasing scrutiny in 2002 for its labeling and advertisement claims. Beginning October 2003, a number of lawsuits, including a class action, were filed in different US courts, claiming exaggerated labeling of Coppertone products. The plaintiffs had alleged that the manufacturer overstated the strength of Coppertone sunscreens in its advertising and promotion campaigns.
Merck acquired Schering-Plough in November 2009 for $41 billion and became party to these lawsuits by default, seeking compensation for publicizing false product information. A spokesperson representing Merck has refuted wrongdoing allegations and consequent liability and defended the quality of products as compatible with the latest FDA standards on sun protection lotions. The settlement is "solely for the purpose of avoiding the burden, expense, risk and uncertainty of continuing litigation," according to the agreement details filed by Merck in a New Jersey federal court.
Other Merck Lawsuits And Merck Class Action Lawsuits
The Coppertone class action is one of the many lawsuits filed against Merck for prescription drug side effects, misbranding, wrong marketing practices, and illegal payments to health care professionals. The following are details of various Merck lawsuits and settlements.
Merck Vioxx Lawsuit
Merck has been subject to 25,000 individual, one anti-trust, and 160 class action lawsuits by US residents affected by Vioxx side effects. The arthritis drug was recalled in 2004 after the FDA adverse reporting system confirmed as many as 139,000 heart attacks linked to it in the last one decade of its sale. It was also responsible for causing heart attacks, hypertension, cardiovascular thromboembolic, hepatic insufficiency, ocular side effects, and dermatologic reactions. In July 2008, Merck set aside a fund of $4.85 billion to cover all compensation claims and legal expenses arising out of Vioxx lawsuits.
In August 2005, the first Vioxx lawsuit trial resulted in $20 million compensation to the family of a Texas man. A Rio Grande City court awarded $32 million, including $25 million in punitive damages against Merck, to family of a 71-year-old man, who died of the drug side effects. Merck paid $58 million to 30 state governments to settle anti-trust lawsuits that blamed the defendant of following deceptive market practices and providing misleading information on Vioxx side effects.
Merck Fosamax Lawsuit
More than 2,000 Fosamax lawsuits have been filed against Merck in the United States. Plaintiffs suffered from a number of side effects from the osteoporosis drug, such as jaw necrosis, knee problems, and hip and femur fractures. According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Fosamax puts users at a six-time greater risk of esophagus cancer. The plaintiffs have sought compensation from Merck on the ground that it failed to disclose safety information regarding Fosamax side effects and to warn consumers adequately. All federal Fosamax lawsuits have been consolidated at the Southern District of New York. In June 2010, a New York City court awarded $8 million to a plaintiff who suffered from jaw necrosis due to Fosamax side effects.
Merck Propecia Lawsuit
A class action and hundreds of individual lawsuits have been filed against Merck following discovery of Propecia side effects in early 2011. The drug prescribed to contain male hair loss is blamed for causing erectile dysfunction, behavior change, mental impairment, and diminished quality of life. The Propecia lawsuit plaintiffs have alleged that Merck did not mention the side effects on the drug label in the United States despite such warnings by European regulators and consequent label changes in 2008.
Merck NuvaRing Lawsuit
Merck is facing close to 1,000 personal injury and wrongful death claims linked to its popular contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRing. The device, according to a study published in the British Medical Journal, leads to deep vein thrombosis and other cardiovascular diseases, causing death and disability in many users. Most of the federal NuvaRing lawsuits consolidated under the Eastern District of Missouri have alleged that Merck downplayed the threat of side effects during its drug promotion campaign and did not warn users about the risk disclosed by European public health regulators.
Merck Zocor Lawsuit
On June 1, 2012, a Zocor class action lawsuit filed against Merck in the Eastern District of Louisiana alleged that the manufacturer marketed the drug without warning users about risks associated with it. The serious side effects of the cholesterol-lowering drug include rhabdomyolysis, muscle injuries, and renal impairment. About half-a-dozen individual lawsuits filed in various state courts have also alleged that Merck sold Zocor without warnings despite being aware that it is dangerous to human health.
Merck Vytorin Lawsuit
In August 2009, Merck reached an agreement to pay a compensation of $41.5 million to settle Zetia and Vytroin class action lawsuits. The plaintiffs sued the pharmaceutical company after data released by the manufacturer in January 2008 highlighted that the costly cholesterol-fighting drugs did not offer any extra benefits as claimed by Merck. In March 2012, Merck paid $5.1 million to settle another lawsuit filed over delayed released of the study.
Merck Mumps Vaccine Lawsuit
A Mumps Vaccine class action lawsuit filed against Merck on June 25, 2012 claims that the drug manufacturer misled users on the efficacy of its product. The lawsuit filed by Chatom Primary Care of Alabama claims that the vaccine is "far less effective" than advertised and Merck sold drugs with "questionable efficacy.” The claim is based on the accusations of two Merck virologists, who claimed to have witnessed improper testing and data falsification during the testing process.
Antibiotics Side Effects Lawsuit
Antibiotics Side Effects and Health Problems
Antibiotics, often considered the most potent life savers, can lead to serious side effects. According to a study published in the April issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association, antibiotics, such as fluoroquinolones, pose a severe risk of a retinal detachment among current users of the drug, which could lead to vision loss, blindness, and other visionary problems. Another unpublished study warns of a significantly higher risk of acute kidney failure among the users of fluoroquinolone antiobiotics, which include Cipro, Avelox, and Levaquin.
Levaquin, Cipron, and other antibiotics are known to be toxic to the connective tissue and can impact cartilage, causing a risk of tendon ruptures. The study questions the drug makers’ failure to identify this potential concern related to the effect of these drugs on the connective tissue and negligence in studying the potential adverse events of Levaquin and Cipron on the eyes. Some of the symptoms of retinal detachment about which the drug manufacturers failed to warn the users about include:
- Flashes of light
- Dramatic rise in the number of floaters
- Feeling bulky eyes or experiencing heaviness in the eye
- Central vision loss
- Dense shadow moving from peripheral to central vision
Antibiotics Side Effects
No doubt these antibiotics help restore health and save life, but inappropriate prescription and misuse of these drugs has the potential of causing adverse events, leaving some patients with severe and permanent vision problems. Often prescribed for bronchitis, sinusitis, earaches, among other infections that can be treated even with less potent drugs, antibiotics can have life threatening side effects, which become apparent after the patient has been cured of the malaise, with the patients experiencing severe pain and weakness. A number of patients even complain of dryness in the eyes, skin, and mouth; uncontrollable shaking; ringing in ears; burning pain and sensation in eyes and feet; delayed urination; tingling in the feet and hands; muscle spasms in back; and heart palpitations. The drugs have the potential of causing severe harm to:
Risperdal Lawsuit Breast Side Effects
Drug maker Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has settled a Risperdal lawsuit on the first day of trial over Risperdal side effects.
The Risperdal lawsuit filed plaintiff Aron Banks states that the Johnson & Johnson antipsychotic drug Risperdal caused him to grow breast tissue.
Aron Banks, 21, claimed he sustained psychological trauma from growing breasts after taking the medication during childhood. Banks took the medicine from 2000 to 2004, when it wasn’t approved for children.
The Banks suit in state court in Philadelphia was the first to go to trial on claims that Risperdal caused boys to grow breasts. Another trial is set to begin Sept. 20 in Philadelphia. The terms of the settlement are confidential, Steve Sheller, the plaintiff’s attorney, said following the announcement in court today.
“The case resolved and the client is satisfied,” Sheller said in an interview.
The Food and Drug Administration approved Risperdal in 1993 for psychotic disorders including schizophrenia.
Alabama Car Accident Lawyer
Moved Click here for new page:
Alabama Car Accident Lawyer
Alabama witnesses more than 300 car accidents every day, with the state mileage death rate well above the national average. On August 28, 2012, a collision between a motorcycle and an 18-wheeler in Opelika city’s Pepperell Parkway caused death of a 20-year-old man. Two days later, one woman died and two men received injuries following a three-car accident on U.S. Highway 431 near Alexandria. On September 4, 2012, a 32-year-old woman died and her 7-year-old daughter was seriously injured near Midland City after a truck hit a SUV and two cars on U.S. 231 North. In 2000, civil rights activist Earl T. Shinhoster lost his life after his vehicle veered off Interstate 85 in Macon County.
Alabama Auto Accident Statistics
According to Alabama transportation department, every driver in the state is at 48 percent enhanced risk of facing fatal crash or injury over his lifetime. For front seat occupants, the probability stands at 44 percent.
In 2010, Alabama car accidents resulted in the death of 848 people. The figure stood at 842 in 2009.
There were 123,731 traffic crashes, of which 774 turned fatal, in 2009.
Cities and towns accounted for about 73 percent of Alabama traffic crashes while rural areas accounted for the most number of fatalities (62 percent).
In 2009, Alabama auto accidents led to one injury in every 15 minutes and one death in every 10 hours.
Of all age groups, about one-fourth of all injured were under 25 years.
The state mileage fatality rate in 2010 was 1.34.
Alcohol was the reason for about one-fifth of Alabama car accident fatalities in 2010 while the highest number of traffic crashes occurred on highways.
Passenger cars were found to be involved in 44 percent of all Alabama car accidents in 2010.
Alabama Auto Accident County
Jefferson County accounted for almost 10 percent of all Alabama car accident fatalities and about 17 percent of all traffic crashes in 2010. Mobile County was second with 8 percent share. Other counties with a high rate of Alabama car accidents include Tuscaloosa and Madison Counties. Birmingham, with about 9,500 auto accidents every year, is the most unsafe city for drivers in Alabama. Mobile, Huntsville, and Montgomery are three other cities with a high number of Alabama car accidents and injuries. Hoover, Dothan, Decatur, and Auburn also witness a large number of traffic-related injuries in the state.
Alabama Auto Accident Causes
Almost 60 percent of all Alabama car accidents occur due to roadway departures. This indicates driver error and vehicle speed as a causative factor. Almost one in five Alabama auto accidents in 2010 was blamed for alcohol consumption. Intersections in the state accounted for 19 percent of all accidents in 2010 while speed was the reason for 17 percent of fatal crashes.
Alabama Car Accident: Common Injuries
Loss of life
Loss of limb, internal injuries, and long-term impairment
Brain, whiplash, and spinal cord injuries
Severe medical conditions caused by injuries
Back and neck injuries
Buns and fractures leading to disfigurement
Alabama Car Accident: Compensation
Any one injured in an Alabama auto accident can seek the following damages subject to the state law:
Compensation to cover medical cost
Financial damages for loss of wage and property
Coverage for physical suffering
Compensation for psychological distress
Compensation loss of job and consortium
Alabama Personal Injury Lawsuits: The Litigation
Pre-Litigation Report Collection: Get in touch with an experienced Alabama car accident lawyer and ask them about statute of limitations as soon as possible. Once you authorize him as your personal injury attorney, the lawyer collects necessary reports from police, hospitals, and experts to press your claim.
Claim: Your Alabama auto accident lawyer makes a list of compensation and sends your claim notice to the at-fault party or their insurer.
Arbitration and Mediation: Either party has the option to go for arbitration or both parties agree to seek third-party mediation. While arbitration is legally binding, mediation is more flexible and you can bargain hard with the help of your Alabama car accident lawyer.
Litigation: If the at-fault driver or their insurer refuses to compensate you or rejects your claims, you can file a personal injury lawsuit, seeking comprehensive financial compensation.
Discovery: The court sends a notice to the defendant about your claim and the personal injury lawsuit enters the discovery stage. Alabama car accident lawyers prepare documents and reports to reinforce the respective position of their clients. There can be negotiations during this phase to settle the lawsuit out of court.
Summary Judgment: If no settlement is reached, any party can approach the judge for a summary judgment. This moves the court and the judge sets the date for trial or allows a summary decision based on findings presented.
Trial and Judgment: The court holds the trial in the presence of a jury and provides opportunities to Alabama car accident lawyers of the plaintiff and respondent to present their cases and cross-examine the witnesses. An award is granted or the lawsuit is dismissed based on merit, facts, and state law.
Settlement: Both the plaintiff and the respondent are at liberty to negotiate the settlement out of court to their satisfaction. They must inform the court about it and get the approval before withdrawing the case. An experienced Alabama car accident lawyer is certainly an asset while striking a settlement through bargain or mediation.
Alabama Car Accident Lawsuit: State Law, Limitations
State small courts have the authority to hear any Alabama car accident lawsuit with damage claims not exceeding $3,000.
Alabama statute of limitation prescribes a 2-year time limit for filing accident related personal injury cases. However, in case of damage to property, the state law allows 6 years to file any damage claim.
The 19th birthday is the deadline for application of the statute of limitation in Alabama. A minor is exempted from it until he turns 19.
For insurance claims, the time limit is governed by respective terms of policies purchased.
For claims against local, state, and federal government agencies or employees, there is a time limit of about 90 to 180 days. Check with your Alabama car accident lawyer for exact details.
Alabama Car Accident Insurance
Alabama is a “fault” insurance state. The tort law system makes you liable to compensation and punitive damages for causing accidents and related injuries.