Lawsuit News Alerts

Negligence Lawsuit for Injury and Wrongful Death


negligence-lawsuitA Seattle family has initiated a $45 million negligence lawsuit against the city authorities holding their slackness responsible for a car accident that led to the death of two family members and injury to another two. The negligence lawsuit alleges that the city authorities failed in their duty to install interlock device on the vehicle of the driver, who had been caught five times previously for DUI and was on probation on the day of the accident. A South Carolina woman won $9.9 million in negligence injury lawsuit filed against an amusement park. The plaintiff suffered brain injury after falling from a ride. She attributed her injury to the reckless operation of the ride that led to twice the approval speed.

On July 22, 2013, a Polk County court awarded $1.1 billion compensation in a medical negligence lawsuit filed against a Florida nursing home. Sixty-nine-year-old Arlene Townsend died at the Auburndale Oaks Healthcare Center following injuries received from multiple falls. Next day, a 20-year-old California woman won $27.1 million in a negligence lawsuit. She suffered from brain injury after the boat she was riding on hit a jet ski. The boat operating company had employed a teenage driver, who failed to control the boat at a high speed.


What Is Negligence Lawsuit?

Read more: Negligence Lawsuit for Injury and Wrongful Death

Hip Replacement Lawsuit Settlement Information


hip-replacement-class-action-lawsuitOver 20,000 hip implant lawsuits are pending for trial in the U.S. federal court system. Johnson & Johnson faces about 12,000 DePuy hip implant lawsuits while other manufacturers, such as Stryker, Biomet, Wright Medical, Zimmer, and Smith, also face thousands of litigations claiming early failure and dislocation of devices. Many users claim to have suffered from bone lysis, nerve palsy, metal toxicity, chronic pain, and other serious complications. DePuy ASR hip lawsuits lead the list, with 7,860 litigations pending in the court. The number of DePuy Pinnacle hip lawsuits exceeds 4,200 while about 600 Biomet metal hip lawsuits are centralized in the court of District Judge Robert Miller, Jr., of Indiana. At least 50 Wright Conserve hip lawsuits are filed in the U.S. federal courts.


Read more: Hip Replacement Lawsuit Settlement Information

Wrongful Death Lawsuit And Negligence Lawsuit


Negligence Lawsuit for Injury and Wrongful Death Lawsuit

A Seattle family has initiated a $45 million negligence lawsuit against the city authorities holding their slackness responsible for a car accident that led to the death of two family members and injury to another two. The negligence lawsuit alleges that the city authorities failed in their duty to install interlock device on the vehicle of the driver, who had been caught five times previously for DUI and was on probation on the day of the accident. A South Carolina woman won $9.9 million in negligence injury lawsuit filed against an amusement park. The plaintiff suffered brain injury after falling from a ride. She attributed her injury to the reckless operation of the ride that led to twice the approval speed.

On July 22, 2013, a Polk County court awarded $1.1 billion compensation in a medical negligence lawsuit filed against a Florida nursing home. Sixty-nine-year-old Arlene Townsend died at the Auburndale Oaks Healthcare Center following injuries received from multiple falls. Next day, a 20-year-old California woman won $27.1 million in a negligence lawsuit. She suffered from brain injury after the boat she was riding on hit a jet ski. The boat operating company had employed a teenage driver, who failed to control the boat at a high speed.

What Is Wrongful Death Negligence Lawsuit?

Negligence refers to the failure to exercise reasonable care by prudent persons or authorities as demanded by the situation. The tort law recognizes any injury caused by carelessness without any intentional action as the ground for negligence lawsuit. The basic idea is that everyone is expected to do their duty with reasonable care and ensure that their inaction or negligence in duty should not cause harm to others.

A number of factors constitute negligence and can be subject to litigation. These include,

  • Carelessness

  • Failure to act prudently

  • Dereliction of duty

  • Unreasonable action

  • Behaving in a negligent manner

  • Failure to respect safety of others

  • Lack of prompt or adequate action

  • Vicarious or secondary responsibility

  • Failure to recognize potential hazards and act to prevent them

Negligence lawsuit is a civil litigation that can be initiated by an injured person against private agencies or public authorities responsible for carelessness that caused him harm to recover compensable damages. Nursing home negligence lawsuit, administration negligence lawsuit, car accident negligence lawsuit, property owner negligence lawsuit, pet owner negligence lawsuit, school negligence lawsuit, employee negligence lawsuit are some of the types of common negligence lawsuits.

Read more: Wrongful Death Lawsuit And Negligence Lawsuit

Premises Liability Lawsuit Do I Have A Lawsuit


Premises Liability Lawsuit Do I Have A Lawsuit

Injury Lawsuit
Philadelphia resident Louis Holland filed a premises liability lawsuit against Amtrak on June 12, 2013, holding it responsible for injuries received at a property owned by the railroad passenger transport corporation. The plaintiff slipped and fell on greasy substance on the escalator he was riding and suffered teeth fracture and multiple face injuries. According to the premises liability lawsuit, the plaintiff has demanded $50,000 in compensation with interest and legal costs, citing that the railroad corporation had failed to keep away dangerous and defective conditions on its property. In 2005, a similar premises liability lawsuit ended with $2.5 million settlement offer from the Philadelphia Fresh Food Terminal that operates the Regional Produce Market.

Premises liability lawsuit constitute 22 percent of all tort litigations filed in the United States. Second only to automobile torts, the plaintiffs filing such lawsuit are from a wide category, including visitors, tourists, employees, and students, while defendants range from individuals and municipal agencies to corporate, public, and private bodies, shops, and restaurants. In the last week of June 2013, Boy Scouts of America and Lewis and Clark Council Inc. paid an undisclosed sum, presumed to be more than $60,000, to a 51-year-old assistant scout master, who lost his leg after being crushed under a fallen tree in 2010.

A similar premise liability lawsuit has been filed by a West Virginia man against the Hardee’s of Man on June 18 claiming compensation for injuries he had following breakdown of chair while having his food at the restaurant. A Tuscan nightclub is facing a premises liability lawsuit for falling to provide security for its customers. Firing by a gun wielding customer in the club led to death of a man. The families of six children, who died in a fire at a Chicago apartment, were awarded $6 million in damages.

Read more: Premises Liability Lawsuit Attorney

Medical Misdiagnosis Lawsuit Attorney


Medical Misdiagnosis Lawsuit

On July 13, 2013, a Texas jury awarded $367,500 to a 54-year-old woman who had to undergo a seven-month-long chemotherapy treatment after being wrongly diagnosed with breast cancer. According to the misdiagnosis lawsuit filed in a Victoria county, the mother of four had a lump in her left breast in 2009. Though it was a benign tumor, her doctor misread the pathology report post-surgery and misidentified routine inflammations for symptoms of Stage IV terminal breast cancer with a less-than a year life span. The plaintiff went for eight rounds of chemotherapy and took over 10 types of medications before another biopsy at the Houston-based MD Anderson Cancer Center in 2011 revealed that she was a victim of breast cancer misdiagnosis.

In June 2013, a similar cancer misdiagnosis lawsuit led to a $200,000 award for a Maine man wrongly diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Doctors misread his treatable non-Hodgkins lymphoma as Stage 4 pancreatic cancer and he had to undergo chemotherapy and medication, resulting in tremendous emotional distress. In April, a New York court ordered Middleton-based Radiologic Associates, P.C., to pay $2.1 million in damages to a man for failure to diagnose a spinal lesion that led to delayed treatment and loss of sensation in his legs.

Medical Misdiagnosis Lawsuit The Meaning

Diagnosis of every disease must follow a systemic method that includes identification of symptoms, recommendation of diagnostic tests, and proper analysis of test reports in the light of the patient’s medical history. The doctor must make detailed preliminary and secondary investigations to confirm any serious illness and refer the patient to any specialist at the earliest. Any deviation from the standard process leading to wrong or delayed diagnosis can severely impact the life and health of patients. On February 15, 2013, JAMA medical journal published a medical misdiagnosis report claiming that misdiagnosis accounted for the highest number of patient injury or death because of medical error. It listed cancer, heart stroke, kidney failure, pneumonia, and infections as the most serious misdiagnosed conditions. According to the report, misreading of patient’s medical history or prescribing wrong tests during the patient-doctor clinical encounters is the most common medical misdiagnosis reported followed by referral mistakes.

Read more: Medical Misdiagnosis Lawsuit Attorney

Medical Malpractice Lawsuit

Common Personal Injury Lawsuits Information 


Medical Malpractice Lawsuit

Medical Malpractice LawsuitOn July 5, 2013, a St. Louis County court awarded $6.4 million to a 59-year-old Maryland Heights man who filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against a doctor of SSM DePaul Medical Group. The jury agreed with the plaintiff contention that the doctor failed to properly diagnose mitral valve prolapsed he was suffering from, which caused him a stroke five years later. A few days later, another medical malpractice lawsuit filed in a Dauphin County court led to $1 million in settlement for the family of a Pennsylvania man, who died following a hip surgery. Earlier in May 2013, a South Carolina court ordered the Heartland of Martinsburg to pay $90 million in damages to the family of a man, who died in one of its nursing homes. The medical malpractice lawsuit had alleged that lack of care at the hospital led to fatal infections and death of the patient.

Medical malpractice contributes to the sixth highest number of deaths in the United States every year. More than 20,000 medical malpractice lawsuits are initiated by U.S. residents every year, making over 2,500 hospitals, doctors, and pharmacies as defendants. While about 225,000 suffer due to doctor error, improper diagnosis, wrong prescriptions, surgical errors, and lack of medical care, 98,000 patients fall victim to wrongful deaths at hospitals, according to a study report prepared by the Institute of Medicine. According to a December 2012 Johns Hopkins University research report, surgical mistakes alone cause at least 4,000 serious injuries every year. About $3 billion was paid in 2012 to settle thousands of medical malpractice lawsuits filed in the United States.

Medical Malpractice Lawsuit: Understanding the Concept

What Is Medical Malpractice?

An avoidable error by a health care professional or facility lading to injuries to patients constitutes an instance of medical malpractice. It includes a range of mistakes, such as missed, delayed, or wrong diagnosis, improper treatment, negligence, lack of attention by doctors, injuries caused by surgical mistakes, unnecessary surgery, wrong prescription of drug and dosages, anesthesia error, and medication mistakes. Medical malpractice claims can also be filed for death or suffering attributed to medication side effects, infections due to lack of treatment or care at the hospital, additional complications, violation of standard inpatient care, and nursing home abuse.

According to the Journal of American Medicine, improper hospital care leads to more than 20,000 deaths every year, while an equal number fall victim to wrong diagnosis and nosocomial infections. About 10,000 face serious injuries from unneeded surgeries. One in every eight medical malpractice incidents leads to litigation.

Read more: Understanding Medical Malpractice Lawsuit

Car Auto Accident Lawsuit

Common Personal injury Lawsuit Series

 Car Auto Accident Lawsuit 

On June 22, 2013, the family of a 22-year-old Chicago man killed in a road accident won compensation worth $3.75 million following the settlement of a car accident injury lawsuit filed against ATS Specialized Inc. A vehicle of the trucking company hit the victim’s car on Interstate 57 near Ludlow from behind in November 2012, leading to his death. The police found that driver was driving at a dangerous speed at the time of accident and failed to slow down despite hitting the victim’s car. Two days prior to this accident, another car accident injury lawsuit resulted in $1.29 million compensation to a Hollywood woman. In May 2013, a Philadelphia jury awarded $19.1 million to a Bensalem man, who lost his leg in a two-car collision in 2009.

Over a million car accident injury lawsuits are filed in the United States each year. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, car accidents in the United States lead to at least 30,000 deaths and 3 million injuries, ranging from minor to serious ones, causing permanent disability every year. The national economy loses more than $230 billion annually following damages caused by car accidents. While celebrities, sports persons, doctors, and talented young men have lost their lives, many others had to suffer for life following brain damage, spinal cord injury, and loss of limb caused by road accidents. No doubt death and disabilities are irreparable, but victims or their families have the option to recover financial and nonfinancial damages and seek punitive damages from erring drivers responsible for accidents and accused of showing disregard to the safety of others on the road.

U.S. Car Accident Injury Lawsuit: Annual Auto Accident Statistics

  • About 6 million car accidents reported every year with over 30,000 deaths and 2.5 million injuries. Almost 90 people die every day because of car accidents. Experts are of the view that a majority of non-fatal car accidents every year go unreported.
  • One car accident injury happens in 14 seconds.
  • About one-fourth of total car accident fatalities include young people aged between 15 and 20 years.
  • Of all car accidents leading to fatalities, 40% are perpetrated by alcohol-impaired drivers while speed accounts for 30% of them.
  • Reckless driving is responsible for 33% car accidents leading to fatalities each year.
  • At least one in five car accidents are due to driver distraction, including use of phone while driving or failure to obey traffic signals.
  • Intersection crashes are most common car accidents in both fatal and non-fatal categories.
  • Texas, California, and Florida witness the highest number of car accidents in the United States. In the recent years, the number of car accidents and consequent fatalities have gone up in Connecticut, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Indiana, and Ohio.


Common Personal injury Lawsuit Series

Defective Product Injury Product Liability Lawsuit

In May 2013, Skechers finalized a $40 million class-action settlement with consumers who filed product injury lawsuits against the American shoemaker. According to plaintiffs, they purchased the Skechers Shape-Ups shoes after watching advertisements and endorsements claiming that the shoe users could experience immense benefits, such as weight loss, strengthened knee and ankle, and superior posture. However, consumers claim having suffered from fractures, slip and fall, accidents, and injuries because of the defective shoe design that leads to instability and forward slipping. An Ohio woman suffered an orbital fracture, resulting in partial disability following the use of Skechers Shape-Ups shoes.

Every year thousands of private and class action product liability lawsuits are filed in the United States, targeting manufacturers across all industries. Auto majors Ford and Toyota, world’s biggest pharmaceutical manufacturer Johnson & Johnson, furniture major IKEA, baby product manufacturer Summer Infant, sports equipment manufacturer Sportspower and Reebok, toy maker Fisher-Price, and pet food producer Nestle Purina are among the most known companies facing dozens of product liability lawsuits following recalls and injuries caused by defective products.


Defective Product Liability Lawsuit Grounds for Claim

The manufacturers have a duty to market quality products, free from any kind of unreasonable danger that may injure consumers. They must follow the set standards during the designing, manufacturing, and quality inspection of their products and focus on the safety and convenience of consumers. Any violation of standard practices or derivation resulting in defective products causing injury to consumers makes manufacturers liable under the law to compensate their victims.

One can file a product liability lawsuit claim seeking compensation against injury or damages caused by a defective product. The most common grounds for filing of product liability lawsuits in the United States include breach of warranty, design defect, negligence during production, strict liability, and consumer protection rules. The law governing defective product claims differs from state to state. The most common grounds include,

  • Manufacturing Error Defectively designed, failure to control quality during the production process, and failure to warn make the manufacturers liable to compensate the user for injuries and damages caused by product defect.
  • Breach of Warranty Consumers are empowered to file product liability claims against the manufacturer for violation of express or implied warranty, merchantability, and lack of fitness for a stated purpose.
  • Negligence Product liability claims can be brought forward if the manufacturer is found to be negligent of any duty stated under the consumer law and failed to inform about the risks associated with products.
  • Strict Liability Principle This espouses that a manufacturer can be held liable for defective products even if he is not negligent. This includes new technologies developed and used without adequate precaution or test.
  • You have a right to file a lawsuit

Common Personal injury Lawsuit Series

Prescription Drug Side Effects Lawsuit


Prescription Drug Side Effects Injury Lawsuit

Prescription Drugs Side Effects Lawsuit AttorneyIn February 2013, the Plymouth Superior Court awarded $63 million to a 16-year-old Massachusetts girl, who was blinded and suffered from life-threatening skin necrolysis and partial brain damage following the administration of Johnson & Johnson’s Motrin ibuprofen in 2003. According to the drug side effect injury lawsuit filed by her parents in 2007, Samantha was given the drug for fever. However, she lost her vision and 90 percent of her skin was subject to toxic epidermal necrolysis due to the drug side effects. Her parents filed the drug side effect injury lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson and subsidiary McNeil, alleging that the manufacturer failed to apprise users of life-threatening side effects of the drug.

The drug side effect lawsuit is one of thousands of product liability and breach of trust claims filed against prescription drug producers and distributors in the United States. According to the latest QuarterWatch report of the Institute for Safe Medication Practices, at least 2 million U.S. residents suffer from drug side effect injuries every year. The FDA MedWatch monitoring system receives about 200,000 complaints each year on prescription drug side effects reported by consumers, doctors, and manufacturers.

Drugs are categorized as products and pharmaceuticals are required to follow certain standards during the manufacturing, distribution, and marketing stages. They must comply with the FDA guidelines as well as consumer safety laws. It is their duty to ensure that their products are safe and accompany all possible information about potential side effects so that no one suffers from any injury from adverse events. Consumers are empowered to sue pharmaceuticals responsible for drug producing and distributing for their failure to provide sufficient information on adverse events and introducing unsafe product by filing drug side effect injury lawsuits.

Read more: Prescription Drug Side Effects Lawsuit

Priest Sex Abuse Lawsuit Attorney And The Catholic Church


Child Sex Abuse Lawsuits

Sexual Abuse Of Children In The catholic ChurchA 51-year-old Saint Paul man has become the first plaintiff to file a sex abuse lawsuit after the new Minnesota Child Victims Act was signed into law by Governor Mark Dayton on May 24, 2013. The new law unanimously passed by the state Senate on May 8 has waived off restrictions imposed by the civil statute of limitation that previously disallowed victims molested or subjected to sexual crime during their childhood to sue perpetrators after attaining the age of 24 years. The sexual abuse lawsuit alleges multiple incidents of molestation by an ex-priest in the 1970s and has also sought for publication of names of 46 priests and church officials accused of “credible accusations of sexual abuse” while working for the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis.

The Sexual Abuse Lawsuit

Filed in a Ramsey County court in May 29, 2013, by a Twin City resident identified as “John Doe 1,” the child sex abuse lawsuit claims that the plaintiff was molested by a former St. Thomas Aquinas Catholic Church priest Thomas Adamson between 1976 and 1977 in St. Paul Park. The lawsuit has named Adamson, the Diocese of Winona, and the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis. The last two have been accused of negligence, inaction, and employing a pedophile with access to children for years. While the sex abuse lawsuit seeks $50,000 in compensation from the defendants, it also wants the court to direct the church to release names of "credibly accused child molesting priests."

Adamson, the accused, first got into controversy in 1964 following sexual abuse allegations. However, he continued to work without any action or police report despite admission of his misdeeds. The former priest was named in a number of child sex abuse litigation's in the past.

The Diocese of Crookston paid more than $2.3 million to settle a dozen of sex abuse lawsuits filed against it following abuse by ex-priest James Porter. The culprit died in 2005 after serving a 20-year-long imprisonment.

Minnesota Child Victims Act Sets Off The Pace

Minnesota is on the verge of witnessing a rush of church sex abuse lawsuits following exemption in the statute of limitations granted by the Child Victims Act for bringing forward litigations by people abused as children. There have been hundreds of complaints against the state Archdiocese and dioceses alleging sexual abuse and molestation by their officials and priests as well as inaction and cover-up attempts when incidents were reported.

The demand for Child Victims Act picked up last year following a verdict by the Minnesota Supreme Court in Jim Keenan's sex abuse lawsuit against the Diocese of Winona and the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis in July 2012. The lawsuit filed by 45-year-old Keenan in 2006 accused defendants of covering up sexual abuse that he had to suffer from when selected as an altar boy between 1980 and 1982. The plaintiff sought waiver from the before 24-year statute of limitations on the ground that repressed memories led to delayed claim. Though there were expert witnesses to support the plaintiff’s claim, the court dismissed the church sexual abuse lawsuit on the ground that it could not bypass the statute of limitations. To make matters worse, the diocese took steps to recover the legal fees it had spent on the battle.

In April 2013, a similar church sexual abuse claim by a 46-year-old man involving a former dorm parent of Faribault-based Shattuck-St. Mary's school was dismissed by a Minnesota court citing the statute of limitations. The culprit, who was arrested in 2012 November, admitted that he had sexual relationship with the plaintiff 32 years ago.

Though the sexual abuse lawsuit failed, yet it caused widespread public indignation in Minnesota. A survey by the National Center for Victims of Crime then found that more than 63 percent people in Minnesota wanted unhindered opportunities for child sexual abuse victims to sue those who abused them and institutions facilitating their abuse at any given time. The civil society also called for erasing the civil statute of limitations and facilitating sex abuse survivors to come forward and sue abusers. Experts also advised in favor of such steps for two reasons – first, the institutions that allowed abuse must be held accountable irrespective of time lapse and second, a victim requires considerable psychological strength and encouragement that is time consuming to come out of childhood exploitation trauma and make sexual abuse claims.

Read more: Priest Sex Abuse Lawsuit Attorney And The Catholic Church

Bed Bugs Lawsuit


After moving into her new Annapolis apartment in 2011, Faika Shaaban began to develop a rash on her body. Little did she know that the rash had been caused by bed bugs. Faika was the victim of an unscrupulous landlord who had been notified just weeks earlier that the apartment he would eventually rent to her had a serious bed bug infestation.

With hundreds of bites and a rash Faika did the right thing and hired a professional lawsuit attorney to file a lawsuit against the landlord.

We are happy to announce that a Jury in Anne County has officially awarded her $800,000 in the case. With $650.000 of that reward being for punitive damages, we are hoping this will send a clear message and warning to landlords and hotels alike. If your property has bed bugs and you do not clean it up , you will be sued.

Read more: Bed Bugs Lawsuit

Class Action Lawsuit Attorney


Hal Rosner was apoplectic.

The Scripps Ranch lawyer turned ever-darker shades of pink as he outlined what he called the U.S. Supreme Court’s war against consumers. He was brandishing a 28-inch, yellow automobile purchase contract and waving it like a pennant.

“It’s a basic, fundamental attack on the United States Constitution, and it’s why our Supreme Court should walk around with shame,” Rosner said. “Our Supreme Court violated the United States constitutional right to jury trial like a group of little whores.”

Rosner’s a trial lawyer, so it’s fair to chalk up some of his outrage down to the natural theatrics of his profession.

But he’s also got good reason to be mad. And so do consumers.

In a game-changing 2011 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court dealt a huge blow to consumer advocates. In a 5-4 ruling, the court essentially said that not only is it OK for companies to put clauses in their contracts forcing customers to settle disputes in private arbitration, but they can also bar customers from bringing class action lawsuits against them or even arbitrating their disputes as a class.

The decision in the case, AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, a class action lawsuit that originated in San Diego, involved customers who had been charged small amounts for phones advertised as “free,” overturned years of law developed in the California Legislature and upheld by its courts to protect consumers against a seemingly unstoppable trend.

For decades, businesses across the country have increasingly been writing their way out of the judicial system. By inserting “mandatory arbitration clauses” into their contracts, companies ranging from auto dealers to cell phone companies to health care providers have cut off their customers’ access to the courts, forcing them instead to settle disputes in private arbitration.

That has long concerned consumer advocates and even some industry insiders, who say arbitration is biased in favor of big business. But, for many observers, those worries are nothing compared with the Supreme Court’s 2011 decision.

“It’s earth-shattering. It takes away your right to hold companies accountable for transactions that we all engage in every day,” said Deepak Gupta, one of the attorneys who represented the plaintiffs in the Concepcion case before the Supreme Court. “We all assume that we have a right to hold a company accountable if they’re cheating us. We assume the consumer protection laws will apply. What’s frustrating is the average person doesn’t know that when they take out a contract … they’ve given away their rights.”

The Golden State for Consumer Protection

Historically, California hasn’t been a bad place to be a consumer.

The legislature in the Golden State has spent the last few decades trying to protect the little guys, and successive big court decisions have upheld consumer rights. Legal Leads

In the 1990s and early 2000s, as mandatory arbitration clauses became all the rage for corporations across the country, the California Legislature pounced, passing a slew of laws in 2002 aimed at protecting consumers from the ever-growing trend toward private justice. (Though one of the key laws has since been widely ignored by much of the arbitration industry).

The activism wasn’t limited to lawmakers. Several high-profile lawsuits concerning arbitration clauses found their way to the California Supreme Court. The granddaddy of these was a case called Discover Bank v. Superior Court, in 2005.

The California Supreme Court ruled in that case that companies couldn’t put blanket bans on class action lawsuits in their contracts. To do so was “unconscionable” in legalese. It wouldn’t fly.

Over the next few years, at least 13 other states ruled that blanket class action bans by companies were illegal, according to a research paper by Myriam Gilles of the Cardozo School of Law and Gary Friedman, a New York attorney.

Then, in 2011, California’s groundbreaking rules were put to the ultimate legal test.

The Concepcion case originated in 2006, when a San Diego couple, Vincent and Liza Concepcion, signed a deal offered by AT&T to receive a “free” phone if they signed a two-year cell phone contract. The couple was later charged $30.22 in sales tax for the phone, and they sued AT&T in a class action.

Read more: Class Action Lawsuit Attorney